Divine works


eng deu рус


Questions for the unanimous already:

Paranoia?

If you prove that there is no problem, that I just have paranoia and far-fetchedness, then I will immediately stop this activity.
We believe that there is a very serious threat to the existence of Civilization and humanity, and it is associated with the development of political technologies.

Self-enhancing public attention:

If there is a problem, it is important that more people deal with it.
Self-reinforcing public attention is most useful.

Criticism is most important:

The attention of people will be attracted - the elaboration of the problem.
Therefore, it is best for interested people to engage primarily in criticism of the problem.
It is advisable to start with identifying, clarifying, assessing the problem, increasing its certainty, evidence.
It is necessary to forecast, model the development of political technologies and their impact on society - in the near future.

Non-academic:

However, this question is not an academic one.
- It affects the interests of both all people and specific rulers.
It is not enough to rely on academic science, especially government-controlled. bodies, even in democratic countries.
- It is necessary to create a wide public autonomous Network for the discussion of this problem.

Security:

Those Network members who live in countries with the most advanced AI technologies of psychological and political application, that is, in technologically advanced authoritarian states, understand the threat best of all.
However, online participation in these countries is life threatening.

Not & quot; organization & quot ;:

The FSB instructions probably have a criterion for the size of the organizations that it should "oversee" and the criteria for "organization".
1. You need to know these instructions.
2. The Anarchist Network as a social network probably does not meet the criteria of “organization.”
3. I myself am not in the mood to "lead" and & quot; organize & quot; to do something.
I am determined to only communicate with a dozen people - on theoretical issues.

& quot; Drug-censorship & quot ;:

Required:
1. & quot; Internal expertise & quot; texts for the possibility of using them to fabricate official accusations.
2. Criticism not of ideas and suggestions, but pointing out expressions that someone might find offensive. For example, statements about "Russian suckers." In this case, it is advisable to propose alternative formulations.

Dilettantism:

From the 1st side, while everything is at the amateur level
On the second hand, the problem is not theoretical, that is, the solution is the state of society, the survival of Civilization.
On the third hand, even the theoretical component of the problem is very extensive - not one academician can solve it alone.
4th side, Western Brain Centers they don't solve the problem, apparently they don't have a social order either.
On the 5th side, discussion of the problem is necessary, first of all, in authoritarian countries, and there, first of all, about `` think tanks '' and their decisions no one knows.
On the 6th side, I have gathered enough information to launch a collective search for solutions.

& quot; Foreign Agent & quot ;:

Is it more efficient not to create from scratch, but at least to cooperate with Western NGOs?
Not a 'bike' to invent, but to create an organization - a `` foreign agent '' on the introduction of E-Joint Democracy in the CIS?

& quot; Bicycle & quot ;:

There are already a huge number of analogues of the Meeting Network.
Examples:
Joint Solutions \ Software Joint Solutions Abstract.docx
E-Democracy \ Civil tech platforms Abstract.docx
FSO Probl-landmarks Inform system \ Problem-landmarks Inform system Implementation Sites Abstract.docx
Conferencing Democracy \ Online Internet Meeting Abstract.docx a>

- Almost all of them are on Wikipedia.
But not for a single article on the Joint, etc. there is no article in the Russian Wikipedia for democracy.
Russians don't even know what it is.

Self-reliance:

People are not proactive, because they think that there are smarter people, professionals who will solve their problems.

The key problem, the only reason for all Russia's problems, is NOT decision-making - by the citizens themselves?

Russians are being held for idiots:
- On TV I constantly hear questions for suckers - What do you think - do you need more female deputies, youth?
- This is a form of & quot; letting off steam & quot ;.

2 stages, 2 layers of the Meeting Network:

According to FSB instructions, there seems to be a Popularity Threshold, after which she pays attention to the initiative.
Completely invisible deployment of the Network is ineffective and impossible, because the provocateurs will be connected anyway.
It will be optimal to create a Network before the Threshold - open.
More precisely, organize 2 layers of the Network:
1. With open participation
2. P2P-E-mail, or Derk-net.
Moreover, these are just my thoughts. - Let the participants decide - what's best - just to get connected.

& quot; Advertising & quot ;:

We need 2 sites:
1. Frivolous - for fame, "advertising", - People's Council Network.docx
2. Frivolous - for business - Questions for the unanimous already.

Tech-Com is the name of a resistance group in The Terminator?

Hosting:

- in some country?

Audience:

Maybe target the Ukrainian audience?

As long as we are talking about an abstract threat of the use of AI, there will be no disagreements.
But when it comes to specific rulers, Russian-speakers can sharply become supporters of the use of AI as a real way to defeat the Americans?

Common platform:

The need for a common moral and ethical platform:

But before jointly seeking solutions, it is necessary to agree on a common moral and ethical platform.
Examples of different orientations, even when there is agreement about the dangers of using AI:
- Chauvinism - unity with the Kremlin in the face of enemies.
- Racism is the attitude towards blacks living on welfare and do not want to work.
What else?

Guiding Questions:

Please submit proposals. Or at least answer the leading questions.
What survey questions would you suggest?

Problem orientation:

Focus not on promoting solutions, but on a collective search for them.
I want to create a Forum to discuss the problem and find solutions.
Not to impose solutions, but to offer them after organizing the Forum, as options.

It is necessary to paint ideas:

In our time, you need to be more convincing than Christ.
Only people with critical thinking have kept the purity of their minds.

Originality of the idea:

I first realized the problem, and only then I found Bostrom.
T e initially I am not a follower of Bostrom.

What did I do:

Took part in the attempt to create the `` Ecopolis of the world '' - an autonomous social-experimental settlement in Donbass.
Wrote hundreds of related articles.
I posted these articles - on thematic forums and on my website;
I sent them to competent organizations.
At the same time he invited everyone to cooperate.
I was afraid to create a group on Social Networks. Instead, he hoped to create a Network - secretly - with the help of E-mail-correspondence, using the method of "Network Marketing" - to spread the correspondence openly, but at the same time so that no one knows either the number of participants or specific participants.
Unfortunately, neither posting on the Forums, nor offers to Institutes and organizations, nor personal mailings have been crowned with success.
The Forums are dominated by trolls that block any dialogue;
In Institutes and organizations, performers are uninterested neither in their work, nor in providing contacts of their activists - to `` competitors. ''
Returned to work through social networks. ... .

Questions for People's Advice:

1. On social networks or with what to create a Network?

2. Deliberative social networks - what are there?

3. What other Russian-speaking Social Networks are there with servers outside of Russia besides Facebook?
For example, the largest Russian-speaking diasporas (Israel, Germany, USA)

4. Which western sites do not have language discrimination, that is, which do not delete texts in Russian.

5. Hosting - which one to use?

About the dispute:

How to increase the fruitfulness of the dispute ?:
- you need to get away from the `` dispute '' to & quot; discussions & quot;
1. & quot; Dispute '' here is a battle of pride.
Position: “I’m right and everyone’s wrong”

2. & quot; Discussion & quot; - expressing your opinion, including reasoned disagreements with other positions - without confrontation and personal criticism of them.
T e with respect for the opinion of the opponent, and the assumption that he may be right.
Do not try to persuade, but only explain why he himself is convinced.