Political Economy:
Limitations of the New Institutional School:
Acemoglu and Robinson are right about the role of inclusive institutions in the development of countries.
However:
The fact that Americans will remain richer than the Chinese will not play a role as before.
The inclusive development of European countries was superimposed on the era of mass wars. - Ongoing - military 'competition', and the advantages of large armies.
In the era of non-violence - information wars, the development of the entire state will not play the same role - the information industry will be able to develop relatively independently.
In competition, the qualitative factor will again prevail over the quantitative factor due to the scalability of mental AI.
Plus, AI itself will be able to innovate - without the need to incentivize people.
Sustainable Development Terms - according to Acemoglu and Robinson:
1. Patent Law:
At the same time, scientists themselves point to 2 components:
- Profit protection - for any citizen,
- Monopolization, hindering the improvement of the invention by the patent holder.
The hypothesis is that Patent Liberalization preserves the 1st component, eliminating the 2nd.
More precisely, only a short-term profit will be ensured - until the introduction of more advanced analogues.
The proposed model is adequate to the modern era of exponential acceleration of development.
2. Centralization:
The hypothesis is that collectively adopted rules perform the functions of centralization, but at the same time they are more effective than it.
It's not about centralization as such, but about the unity and effectiveness of the rules.
Centralization is a tool, a means, effective in specific historical conditions. Its product, the rules, works.
Centralized rule-making procedures were efficient, uncontested - before DAI.
Shared rule-making is more effective - with DAI, for example, using the Problem-Based Information System method.
There are 2 methods of earning income:
1. Technical. - By increasing labor productivity.
2. "Political." - By monopolizing production conditions.
The most popular method of monopolization today is patent.
The purpose of the political system is to eliminate the 2nd method, leaving only the 1st.
The second method eventually begins to harm the monopolist himself.
& nbsp;
From the 1st side, I climb into the kalash row
- I myself have come across home-grown philosophical writings that claim to revolutionize science.
And I am also absolutely not recognized by scientists.
On the other hand, the truth is simple.
Scientists may well answer my simple questions - just as simple.
& nbsp;
Misconception - about replacing the labor force with robots.
& nbsp;
Changing the price ratio.
1000 years ago, a chicken leg was more expensive than a delivery service.
Today it's the other way around.
Do not stitch the ends of the means.
Multifactorial approach
myth: Corporations are interested in liberalism:
Corporations are interested in partial and conditional liberalism.
Corporations are interested in liberalism - regarding feudalism and communism:
- property protection,
- freedom of trade,
- free slave. force.
The condition is - slave. strength is the former exclusivity of a person, distinguishing him from other means of production.
However, with cheap psychic AI, corporations can benefit from a `` new slavery '' - with the formal preservation of all liberal human rights and freedoms, and even with the preservation of the usual achieved quality of their lives.
Already today, Corporations are trying to monopolize certain conditions of production, for example, to receive rent from patents. (see & quot; Patent Liberalization & quot;)
Non-liberalism:
The second reason for the shortcomings in the conditional RK, apart from the lack of democracy, is the lack of liberalism.
Why do price markups reach 300%? Why are some food prices higher than in Europe? Despite the fact that salaries are not higher.
Officials blame the traders for allegedly colluding with each other.
But this is also a criminal deception of the people.
- If there was freedom of trade, then `` conspiracy '' would be impossible. - In case of collusion of merchants, it would be profitable for the new merchant to take all the profits for himself, reducing the price.
In fact, it is not the merchants who are to blame for everything, but the officials themselves.
- It was the criminals who created an opaque licensing system - in order to receive bribes.
Officials taunt people, urging them to fight corruption.
The quality certification system is also a hoax.
1. The quality of products imported from Europe is controlled in Europe itself.
2. Poor people are forced to consume food of extremely poor quality.
Created the same licensing system - the 1st president - with the goal of:
1. Receiving bribes from Western oil corporations.
2. Concentration of power in your hands.
it was beneficial for him that his accomplices appreciated the place of the `` landowner '' granted to him - for the opportunity to be a little `` president '' in the region.
Why is liberalism important today?
This has always been the case. - There have always been rich and poor, there has always been someone robbing someone.
It would seem - nothing terrible, on the contrary - even in dictatorial states, under external pressure, they are forced to pretend the observance of human rights.
The problem is that the existence of humanity has never been at stake before.
- Homo-ecology was in balance - Wolves could not kill all the `` hares '' - they did not have the right tools for this.
Most profitable job:
Everyone is looking for such a job to get the maximum salary per unit of labor expended.
This kind of work is politics.
1. Confiscation of property of criminals.
2. Raising salaries many times - It will give even much more than the confiscation of the property of criminals.
Yes, the robbers, as expected, threaten life, terrorize those they rob, so that they do not resist.
However, every cloud has a silver lining. New technologies that increase the potential for deception are simultaneously increasing the capacity and elimination of robbers - nonviolently, electronically - through the implementation of a parallel E-democracy - the Advisory Network. - below.
Castrated Freedom:
Radio Liberty and other `` provocateurs of the Maidan '' don't actually provoke anything.
They just let off steam dissatisfied, giving them the opportunity to `` beat the boss '' in the comments, and the boss should take note of the dissatisfied.
They do not answer the question `` What to do? '' At all, do not help to organize.
Why is that? There is a suspicion that Western politicians, for their part, are also interested in the status quo.
Moreover, they see the phenomenal prospects that Russian technologies promise them.
Conclusion: Create a 'Meeting Network' necessary - "with your own hand." Not hoping for anyone.
More precisely, hoping only for solidarity.
About communism, by the way:
I am an anti-communist.
I approve of the idea of communism. But `` with good intentions ... ''
Lenin thought nothing of it. Trotsky also only analyzed well the process of the degeneration of communism, but never proposed a non-utopian way out.
Nevertheless, communism had a lot of very useful ideas and signs.
Unfortunately, small flaws in the basis of its design brought down the whole structure and compromised many ideas so much needed today.
Compromise and Optimality
Often the best compromise
The criterion of optimality in this context is the survival of the earthly Civilization.
Fortunately, as a rule, there are solutions `` the wolves are fed and the sheep are safe. ''
Examples:
Vegan:
Animal killing is certainly not justified today.
- Meat cooking is the cultivation of selfishness - your own pleasures disproportionate to the suffering of others.
Optimum - Vegetable meat - can be more cost-effective today.
Vegetable meat is not soy products, but natural meat identical to the animal.
Unfortunately, most vegans are selfish too - they prefer selfish `` show off '' the result. - Only 0.0% of vegans are engaged in the development of Vegetable meat.
Homophobia:
We, for example, feel disgusted with sodomy.
But we feel even greater disgust for organized violence, war.
Homophobia is often used as a political tool, like religion. For example, the Kremlin.
More Optimal - Hidden Homosexuality:
- LGBT people agree not to engage in propaganda,
- Homophobes agree not to discriminate against them.
Analog - In most cultures, only public defecation is condemned.
Racism:
Xenophobia is ineradicable, like defecation, but racists have been given the ability not to be racist.
& quot; Religion = opium & quot;
- This is largely true.
But atheism is not optimal either.
More optimal, for example, Liberation theology and Christian base communitie.
Liberalism:
& quot; Neo-liberalism & quot; not optimal. It increases social polarization and instigates 'Managed Democracy', which is highly likely to lead to the demise of the Earth Civilization.
Today, the weight of the contradiction between liberalism and limited resources (land, oil) is naturally decreasing - with the development of technology - with an increase in productivity that is an order of magnitude faster than population growth (Agro-automata), and a reduction in the cost of alternative energy sources (Solar panels). p>
Today, more optimal - liberalism - in the full sense - economic relations not distorted by social institutions of protectionism `` Preferential option for the rich '' and monopoly.
In the context of the re-miniaturization of AI-based production, a more optimal compromise is the liberalization of the means of production, and Intellectual Property. in particular
- see. Libertarian Socialism and the Ark of Freedom.docx
Nonviolence:
The leading factor of social polarization is violence today - the maintenance of protectionist institutions - through coercion.
Institutions of reputation and openness are more optimal than enforcement of contracts and oaths.
Paradoxically, in modern communities in which the state was expelled. police (Cheran, Zapatista, Barbacha, CHAZ (Seattle)) crime is much lower than in neighboring areas controlled by foreign police.
On the other hand, non-violence is not optimal due to the provocations of the same neighbors today.
More optimal is the expulsion of the provocateurs.
Sea settlements are optimal for the ability to leave a neighbor without affecting him. -
- Today, land is a less significant economic factor than customs barriers.
The principle of non-participation of the siloviki in decision making can also be a compromise - a decision that eliminates the main harm and the meaning of violence.
Maximalism and Optimality:
& quot; Center & quot; political trends in authoritarian states are extremist.
Maximalism is rarely optimal:
Intolerance for 'Managed Democracy' - a rare example of optimality of maximalism
True, constructive Egalitarian libertarianism is more optimal for saving the World.
Occam's Logic Razor
This is not an abstraction, but a narrowing of concepts
Example: State Capitalism
This is economic freedom for the purpose of economic equality.
|