Sea Migrant Camp:
Accommodation of a camp for migrants crossing the Mediterranean Sea - in the Mediterranean, more precisely in the Adriatic Sea, is more profitable than camps on the territory of the EU:
1. Less costs of keeping migrants in the camp:
Violence is limited by human rights.
The allowance and facilities in the camp must exceed illegal earnings.
Restrictions on illegal earnings reduce freedom of entrepreneurship.
2. "Houseboat" cheaper than a house on earth, paradoxically.
(See Project Houseboat)
Clearing the split:
In Europe, there are irreconcilable differences between the `` fascists '' and anti-fascists.
The sea camp of migrants is a way to completely eliminate this contradiction:
On the first hand, migrants are not in the EU;
On the 2nd side, all migrants are saved. They are even helped to migrate, find employment and live in the European legal environment.
A tax-free maritime economy can be more competitive than an economy in the EU.
The main task of the `` anti-fascist '' activists then there will be lobbying for duty-free trade with similar `` Free Economic Zones ''.
Migrant Sea Camp and Venice 2.0:
The Sea Migrant Camp could become the basis for the experimental Autonomous Communities Venice 2.0.
Collaboration of numerous `` anti-fascists '' and not yet existing `` survivors '' can go a long way towards building loyalty to the Ark of Liberty in European society
Project Bermeha:
Project & quot; Bermeha & quot; there is a settlement of sea pirates on the ghost island of the Caribbean.
Bermeja Island exists - according to www.maps.ngdc.noaa.gov - 91.446 ° W, 22.206 ° N, 4.7 m above sea level.
But it is not officially - under the agreement of Presidents Bill Clinton and Ernesto Zedillo.
The island is located 140 km off the coast of the Yucatan, in the Economic Zone of Mexico.
Lobbying can be organized in the US and Mexico not to obstruct the establishment of the Bermeja settlement on this island.
Settlement functions for the US government:
1. Voluntary resettlement of illegal migrants from Mexico to the United States.
2. Experimental Free Political Zone, which creates an alternative for migrants to migration to the USA.
See: Deep globalization instead of migration.docx >
The US government will not interfere with the Project, as there was likely a corrupt act on its part.
(& quot; The oil reserves transferred to the United States are estimated at more than 22 billion barrels (more than $ 1.5 trillion in 2018 prices))
The disappearance from the archives of Mexican state institutions of documents concerning the 10-year moratorium on the production of hydrocarbons in this area, signed in 2000 by Mexico and the United States. ''
www.ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bermeha)
However, a declaration of the Prohibition of Subsoil Use, etc. is required. economic activity in settlements within the Economic Zone of Mexico.
Disadvantages of the Project:
Hurricanes. - Hurricanes passing through the Caribbean sometimes deviate to the west.
However, you can use the Free Breakwater (See Project Free Breakwater)
There were several similar settlement projects that turned out to be drowned.
& quot; Pirates & quot; here are not sea robbers, but anarchists.
That is the word `` pirates '' used in an informational sense. - One of the foundations of the Free Political Zone is the reform of intellectual property rights.
Anarchism is nonviolence by definition.
Venice 2.0 - Project:
Venice was founded by refugees from the terrorists of the medieval horde.
Venice 2.0 will be founded by refugees from the state. terrorists heirs of the medieval horde.
Micro-communities in Alaska - Project:
Legal aspects:
The sale of Alaska by the US Russian Empire is fictitious because:
The goal stated by the Emperor of the Russian Empire in the sale of Alaska was a lie.
The transaction was NOT aimed at the actual occurrence of the legal consequences that were caused by it.
The true goal was to forestall the emergence of the RSA - the Independent Russian State of America, 2nd Pugachev.
However, this does not imply the need to declare the transaction null and void, but the recognition of actions corresponding to the actual goal follows.
In particular, the recognition of the rights of Russian Micro-communities in Alaska.
By the way, the will of the party to the transaction was not free, either.
US interest:
Russian liberal micro-communities in Alaska are cheaper but more effective than sanctions.
& nbsp;
Legal note:
A fictitious transaction is a transaction made without the intention to create the legal consequences that it intended;
A sham deal is a deal made by the parties to conceal another deal that they actually made.
The transaction must be aimed at the real occurrence of the legal consequences that are caused by it.
The expression of the will of the party to the transaction must be free;
https://uteka.ua/publication/commerce-12-pravovie-soveti-67-osnovaniya-i-pravovye-posledstviya-priznaniya-sdelki-nedejstvitelnoj
|