Divine works


eng deu рус


TK of the "Deliberative Network" - Seed:

That " Seeding " for the implementation of Strategies for the development of technical specifications are advised by the Network docx

The participant can:
1. Add your own version of the Problem, Solution or Argument.
2. Edit the variant of Problem, Solution or Argument - another participant.
In the case of editing, the 1st author receives an automatic notification about the editing of his wording. New fixes are automatically highlighted.
1st author has the option to `` rollback '' fixes.
However, at the same time, the principle of preserving all original records is observed - by automatically creating new branches.
In this case, the author of the original recording can delete the resulting branch.
Branches - Problems, Decisions and Arguments are automatically formed.

& nbsp;

Problem is added only as a sub-Problem to any Solution in the hierarchical Problem Tree .

Thread Ratings:

All Branches are automatically rated with Attributes.
Any participant can give his own assessment of this Branch for different Properties.
Information about the participant who made the rating is saved.
In general, all ratings are saved as original information.
The first purpose of the ratings is to reduce the Trash information in the Deliberative structure by sorting it and filtering it according to the criteria of the ratings of other participants when it is displayed.
Since participants also automatically receive properties based on their ratings, you can filter content based on the properties of the participants who gave the ratings by which this filtering is performed.

& nbsp;

Primary Problem tree :

Strategy for the development of TK of the `` Deliberative Network '':

From the fact that I quite independently came to the same structure as the Problem-Based Information System, it follows:
1. Correctness of the idea. - Incorrect identical complex reasoning is unlikely.
2. That I have not lost my sanity. My reasoning is not far-fetched, delusional, and what I present can be trusted.

There are about 10 implementations of "bicycle" Problem-oriented information system.
See: Problem-landmark information system Abstract.docx

On the first hand, it is advisable to start with the study of history, the results of their use.
On the second hand, it is advisable to simultaneously develop the technical specification - from scratch, so as not to inherit the shortcomings of existing systems.

TK of the Consultative structure of the seedMy.docx

& nbsp;

Hybrid Forum – Deliberative Network - Project:

Idea:

This is a regular Internet Forum with the ability to rate posts.
By default, the ratings of the participants of the Hybrid Forum are open.
For this, participants receive information about other participants who have close `` profiles '' ratings - by potential like-minded people.

Possibility also:

1. Filter posts that have high ratings from like-minded people.
2. Filter out interlocutors - leave only like-minded people.

The disadvantage of this filtering is the echo chamber effect.
However, expanding the available horizon of the worldview, on the contrary, will reduce this effect.

The benefits far outweigh, however:

" + " Raising political education. -
State trolls will not be able to make discussions destructive through insults and manipulations.
" + " `` Atomization '' will drop sharply society.
" + " People will be able to negotiate, plan a joint watered. activity.

Independence from pro-power journalists:

People will be able to read and watch not what journalists impose on them, but that. what like-minded people choose.
People will spend time searching for the information they need - not one by one - their search performance will increase by orders of magnitude.
But it is search that is the narrow link, the `` last mile '', which allows you to hide important social information from people.

A person will become not passive consumers of information that bloggers who have hardly discovered them, but an active participant in political processes, since he will know - all like-minded bloggers, that is, the attention of `` smart '' bloggers will no longer be in short supply, and they will be able to communicate with every person.

Decentralization:

A hybrid forum can and should be P2P, distributed, decentralized.

Search for 'Servant of the People':

The main difference between a personal political defender and a simple lawyer is that the "Servant of the people" must not only understand the law, but also be like-minded with the client.
That is, again, the main bottleneck hindering the introduction of this extremely important institution of democracy is the search according to the most difficult criteria.

The idea behind a Hybrid Forum, therefore, is to turn `` likes '' into into your personal search query.

Social media flaw:

- they are people oriented, not problem oriented.
Search for like-minded people - along the chains of `` friends '' - fades out in these chains.
Social networks are good for communicating with old friends, but not for finding new ones.

" Discussion groups " - disadvantages:

1. Centralization:
The administration, for example, Facebook Groups, can remove a member without warning and in violation of its own rules.
This excludes Facebook Groups from consideration given that they only require 1 account.

2. Insufficient, incomplete bottom-up moderation.

Although, technically, the proposed Hybrid Forum belongs to the category of " Discussion groups " ;.