Divine works


eng deu рус


Social order - Project :

 

Idea: Civil Social Order :

- Scientific 's study first ,

- Software (Software) ,

- Administrative x function first .

 

Scientific research :

1. Free scientific research :

Analog: Free software :

"+" The quality is not inferior to commercial software .

Analogue: Wikipedia:

"+" The quality is not inferior to professional encyclopedias.

 

2. Lobbying of scientific subjects (grants):

Problem: Malo democratically th control are scientific E studies :

- State science is financed by the executive branch,

- Commercial science is funded by corporations.

 

The idea is to create an additional civil society institution that directly affects government research centers.

 

Software (Software) :

Today, software is the main factor in the survival of Civilization.

Wherein:

Commercial interests are not focused on politically necessary software.

“Free” programmers are not experts in politics and do not understand socio-political needs.

 

The idea is to create an additional institute of civil society developing those. task for programmers , particularly for orderly control administrative x function d

 

Administrative functions :

Problem: Autonomy and mediation of the executive branch .

Separation of power is the main threat to the survival of civilization and even humanity - in the next 400 years.

 

The traditional mechanisms of democratic representation and control of power are not enough - today.

 

Direct democracy - is not optimal th decision as " atomized " people can be easily IT -manipulyatsii , efficiency Kotor second in the middle of the 21st century will increase by an order.

 

The idea is to create an additional institution of civil society directly controlling

 

Analog: Political Parties :

Professional politicians have their own interests.

Managers-politicians are easily "overbought" by corporations.

 

On the 2nd side , today the software :

1. Dramatically increases the potential effectiveness of direct group control of the executive branch,

2. It allows direct :

- Drafting bills,

- Budget development,

- Social. order for tenders.

 

Analogue: NGO, NGO:

NGOs, NGOs are mediated. - Their lobbying is not very effective today.

Today, social processes are accelerating, and the Point of No Return is approaching.
- All potential opportunities must be realized in full, and very quickly.

 

Problem: Professional experts :

1. Experts from corporations. - A conflict of interest exists .

2. "Independent" "professional" = paid experts. “They can be outbid, since they work for money.”

Vows and assurances do not work, as history proves.

3. The own interests of the management of "professional" organizations.

- " People are donating to Amnesty, believe that they facilitate poverty, and not subsidized comfort thick of the cat as" .

 

Occupational hazard:

Participation professional 's expert s in the solution of social and political issues is a threat to humanity - as technology factor in the sustainable development of civilization - the most powerful today, and this weight is increasing rapidly.

 

Solution: Volunteer experts :

It is necessary to create the Institute of Public Expertise .

Paradoxically, the quality of the expert s -volonter s will be higher than that of a professional 's experts:

1. High level of education,

a large number of competent people are turning into quality.

2. Factor of modern information , AI - systems.

3. The factor of transparency and " Know how " -secrets :

Professionals are interested in hiding effective methods of their work.

In the context of complex modern technologies, the medieval accumulation of personal methods is much inferior to the united mind.

This, by the way, was one of the few advantages of rocket science in the USSR over the United States.

4. Psychological-motivational factor , Social factor :

People motivated not by power (pride) and not by money, but by concern about a common problem, are capable of incomparably more effective cooperation with each other .

True , for this it is necessary to create adequate of IT - tools "deliberative structures."

5. The pleasure factor of " labor " :

Activity is a human instinctive need.

In conditions of growing prosperity and satisfying basic needs, in conditions of free competition in the labor market, “Work in Pleasure” wins - such forms of work organization in which a person works not for money, but for the joy of activity .

However, the most significant factor in the joy of the "creative" work is th e collective th government, that is, non-executive and - P 2 P - self-organized labor .

The lack of "management" as a social "class" , in turn , is important for the survival of humanity - today.

Analogue: Free software is superior to professional :

Professionals are forced to look for indirect ways to monetize their products.

6. Public administration:

Those who make management decisions should not be paid.

Analogue: "Servants of the people."

see: Ukraine Comments My .docx

 

 

There are many institutions and organizations concerned with democracy and sustainable development.

Example s :

- the NDI - H au Democratic Institute, USA

- NED - National Endowment for US Democracy

- WMD - World Movement for Democracy 

- IFDS - International Forum for Democratic Studies

- USIP - US Peace Institute

- CIMA - Center for International Media Assistance

- Network of Democracy Research Institutes

 

However, the efficiency of all these institutions and organizations is extremely low.

- There is a degradation of democracy not only outside the 1st world, but even in the United States itself.

The main reason for low efficiency is the indirect transfer of the interests of people interested in developing democracy.

Most objectively interested in democracy are ordinary Americans - the “people" of the United States.

But:

1. There is a distortion of the interests of the US people in the process of control I mentioned organizations,

2. The "class" factor. - The influence of large asset owners and top managers of large corporations is more expressed .

 

Therefore, NGOs with a “horizontal” structure should better express the interests of the people.

IT today makes the horizontal structure potentially more efficient.

 

Funding for analytical work:

optimum: Preemptive financing by "Traitors-Capitalists"

examples: Soros, Bill Gates.

 

Despite the fact that, on average, the interests of the “capitalists" do not correspond well to the development of democracy, however, there is a strong spread among them.

"People's gathering", crowdfunding is still inferior in effectiveness to centralized financing.

 

Another thing is the efficient use of allocated grants and subsidies.

- The effectiveness of centralized organizations is very low exactly where they are most needed - in the countries of the 2nd and 3rd worlds.

 

The effectiveness of centralized organizations in the 2nd world countries:

I personally observed that 99% of the money allocated is not spent rationally:

1. Statement : Support for hypocrisy:

When visiting the Local Organization by guests and auditors from the West , people gather who are familiar to the leaders of the Organization who portray random migrants.

2. "Cut": Support immorality:

The money allocated to the Local Organization is divided as loot between the acquaintances of the executives who are employed by the Organization , or are made out as help to all the same acquaintances.

3. Bribes: Support for corruption:

Part of the money is spent on bribes to officials who gave permission for the activities of this "charity" Organization.

4. Theft: Support and cynicism:

Items donated to help migrants are sold out.

 

 

Civil Innovation Forum:

 

 

6 7 0 0