Divine works


eng deu рус


Appeal 2021:

We are very concerned about the threat of increasing effectiveness of propaganda and political manipulations associated with the accelerating development of IT technologies.
We are very concerned that this threat is being hushed up, when it is incomparably more terrible than the climate threat! “Climate without people is meaningless!”
On the first hand, the media in Western countries write about "Russian propaganda", about interference in elections. But they absolutely do not write about the development of AI tools used for manipulation.
On the 2nd side, individual scientists e- "alarmists" periodically scare AI . But we think they misunderstand this threat! - "Alarmists" see the threat in the Artificial Intelligence itself, and not in its use as a weapon.

We don't consider ourselves paranoid. We take our concerns seriously.
We do not limit ourselves to drawing attention to the most terrible threat, but we make specific proposals for its elimination.
We can introduce you to all our justifications and proposals.

We are concerned about the threats posed by climate change, with the growing gap between the polluting 3rd world and the 1st too. We are concerned about hunger and sickness,
We are concerned about the threat of wars, terrorism, violence and discrimination too.
We have effective proposals to reduce these threats too, although we consider the climate threat and the threat of war to be secondary.
And we believe that the solution of these problems is connected with the solution of the problem of improving the manipulation of people too.

 

Newsletter 22:

We are looking for people who want to engage in effective and meaningful community activities.
We have constructive, highly adequate proposals for this.
We consider highly probable the death of a free Civilization on Earth, and possibly of humanity in general.
Indeed, there is a lot of inadequate noise on this topic.
But, before judging us, we ask you to first familiarize yourself with what we write.
We consider the most significant work aimed at preventing the death of Civilization.
We think that the most effective are not flash mobs , performances and protests, but scientific developments.
Please keep the link to our website as it may be removed here as well. -
We are against conspiracy theories, but the facts are:
We posted these proposals on dozens of web forums in Europe, the USA and Ukraine.
We wrote these proposals to hundreds of specialized public organizations.
We, anti-extremists and anti -terrorists , were banned from almost all the Forums where we registered - they were banned in violation of the Rules of these same Forums. We were banned even on Facebook .
Almost all public "independent" organizations to which we wrote did not respond to us.
We also attach several of our essays - right there.

 

People Newsletter

We are a group of people who are concerned about the threat of the death of Civilization due to the use of IT and AI to manipulate people.
Help, please advise us - How to find people who are seriously concerned about this problem too?
We sent the same request to relevant organizations. However, we did not receive a constructive response. Probably centralized organizations are not inclined to hand over their followers.
We tried to blog on Facebook . However, in this way we were not able to create a network of people concerned about this problem so seriously as not to be limited to comments. In addition, we met resistance - several of our Facebook accounts were blocked.
We have published relevant announcements on web forums. However, since 2017, approximately 27 out of 30 US and European forums have had our accounts blocked as well.

 

People of the West Newsletter

We are 3 people from the " atomized " CIS, concerned about the development of AI technologies for manipulating people.
We fear that this poses an existential threat to humanity.
We are sure that most researchers in the West misunderstand the threat.
“They analyze the threats that may come from the AI itself and from failures in its use.
But they underestimate the threat from the targeted use of AI as a psychic weapon.

We found about a hundred organizations that are investigating this problem.
But we did not find any of them in Russia and China - where the greatest threat comes from.
We are sure that, first of all, it is necessary to interact with the people living there.
We are looking for unanimous people. We searched for them through social networks.
However, professional trolls oppose us on social networks. Several of our Facebook accounts have been blocked.
In addition, the organization of Facebook , LinkedIn and similar centralized social networks is not adequate to the specified goals, which is why the search for like-minded people on a non-popular, non-entertainment topic in them fades along the chains, and communication drowns in irrelevant relationships.
In unchained ≈ 40 web forums in the US and Europe, almost all of our accounts were banned centrally as well.
We also prefer direct invisible letters - for personal safety. -
On the 1st side, we are open, law-abiding, we have nothing to hide,
on the 2nd side, we take into account the instructions of political intelligence services that react to exceeding the threshold of contacts - visible

We have offered cooperation to many relevant NGOs in the West.
However, only a few formal replies were received.
Perhaps, hired, uninterested people are put to work with letters.
Possibly, the officials do not answer us, because they fulfill the instructions - "from above", and in them P 2 P -activity is not provided for in the West either.
Even in the West, we have not found a single direct action group taking legal action - on its own. We found only "Think Tanks" that make recommendations for officials who analyze, but do not engage in social engineering developments, such as software .
Employees of centralized organizations are guided by careers and subsidies, so their actions are ineffective , they do not meet people's expectations.

Therefore, we are addressing you as a private person, and not as an official person.
We will be happy to share with you a dozen of our suggestions - how to avoid negative development.
Here are 5 of our suggestions:
1. Without chainsPermanent , Independent Activist Database Soul Search Project.docx
2. Create a specialized non-academic P 2 P -Network with only P 2 P -coordination of scientific topics and P 2P -donation - to effectively search for ways to solve the above-mentioned problem.
A variety of scientific approaches is the only way to survive today.
3. Make a comparative assessment of the risk - the risk of an AI manipulative catastrophic path is much greater than the risk of pure AGI that humans can control.
The development of AI psychic weapons is more dangerous than WMD today, but as long as it's not spectacular, it's being ignored.
The Americans are busy squabbling among themselves - out of the blue. They exaggerate racism, gender , climate, but they can miss a really terrible threat.
The cheapest and most effective method of international security today is the creation of a network for professional P2P work of Americans with "Russians" too.
4. Proposal for an effective solution to the migration problem.
5. Proposal for a way out of the gas crisis in Europe.

"Semiautomatic":

Western AI -alarmists look in the wrong direction. -
No need to wait - when automatic AGI will surpass the human level. -
The fastest growth of labor productivity in the economy occurs precisely - in demagogy, and - already today.
myopic AI alarmists that the whole world is the same as they live in - in which the main threat can come from AGI.
But when the Americans around them change too, it will be too late.
But this will not yet be the death of mankind - before death there will be another 300 years. It will simply be a point of no return.

We:

We live in the "field conditions" of the epicenter of zombies , and we can describe for you the growth of the "utopia" AI sustainability factor here now.
In addition, we have a fresh look at the issues that are discussed in MIRI, CSER . TERRA . FHI . FLI . IFTF . wfs . GCRI . SU , AI 2, EA, etc.
For example, state and centralized research organizations in the West are no longer working sufficiently, but are still very democratic and efficient.
Because of this, people do not see the potential instability of Western democracies, which is already clearly visible here - in manipulative pseudo- "democracies", which do not fundamentally differ from democracies supposedly real, but far from perfect, and still temporarily stable only because for historical reasons.
With a threat to the existence of Civilization, one cannot rely on luck.
The exponent of the development of society's resistance to degeneration must outstrip the exponent of technological development.

Please advise how we can find young independent academic activists who are more interested in the sustainability of democracy in the US and Europe than their personal career in an existing scientific organization.
It will be very helpful if you:
- Advise us - where or how to find people who may care about solving the above-mentioned problem and cooperation with us on building P 2 P -science, -donorship, -politics, -economics, or
- Forward this letter to such people;
- Point out our mistakes to us;
- Advise us - what our work will be the most effective.
We would also appreciate your information on suitable grants and programs for us, as some of us have had difficulty finding employment.
Here is a site with a little chaotic articles on the problem - one of us: http://dw2020.narod.ru/

 

Proposal 31:

"Self-organization of the Deliberative structure" I proposed 3 times in 1990.
However, today this idea can be not only competitive, but can save thousands of innocent people in Ukraine from death.
I suggest you try. -
If we fail, then you will spend a little time improving your knowledge of physics, etc.
But if you succeed, then you will save more people from death than if you were shaking a machine gun on the front line.

 

Appeal Tech Augmented Keyboard with Smart Glasses:

Hello!
We are looking for supporters of free horizontal development of socially important projects
We don't just dislike the hierarchical organization of startups . - we consider the hierarchical organization dangerous in anticipation of the use of IT technologies to manipulate people.

How are traditional startups organized ?:
1. Businessman (Inventor) takes out a patent for (his) invention
2. Advertises this invention to risky ("venture") investors, receives investments at a high percentage.
3. Creates a company, hires performers, or gives orders to freelancers .
4. Creates a prototype, demonstrates to investors, takes more investments.
5. Gives orders to manufacturers.
6. Tries to become self-financing.

Corporations have raised the price of patents a lot over the past 50 years - in the fight against "Submarines". (Corporations invested heavily in R&D and then found their R&D blocked by secret "umbrella" (broad scope) patents.)
In addition, one of us, for example, encountered the state. scammers when in 2004 he tried to take out a patent for "Video Input" .
Finally, we are opponents of intellectual monopoly fictitious "property", we are supporters of the liberal principle of "prohibition to prohibit". -
The author can receive remuneration for his work and expenses - without monopolization and transfer of rights to use his developments.

We propose to create the following institution (that is, rules, principles) for the development of projects:
1. Lack of centralized finance.
2. Openness - total:
- subject of development,
- Finance related to projects under development.
3. "Gift Economy" - Participants do what they consider socially important and necessary, and sponsors make donations to them for what they also consider socially important and necessary.
That is - the lack of orders, including hiring. Work - on horizontal links.
4. Collective protection of antimonopoly copyrights.
Copyright use for :
- Prohibition of monopolization of the rights of use,
- Prohibition of military use of developments.

If you consider the proposed institution to be a utopia, then we will be happy to read your criticism, preferably constructive, that is, with a proposal of alternatives corresponding to the spirit of this proposal.

We apply the seed of the subject of the 1st joint open development - the Augmented Keyboard with Smart Glasses Project.