Divine works


eng deu рус


Find mutual understanding with Lukashenka:

Is anyone working on Lukashenka 's psyche ?
In personal autocracies, working on an autocrat can be one of the most effective and least damaging.
Lukashenka is not a beast, he simply does not have the right understanding. Elena Ceausescu also sincerely believed that she did what was best for people - that's how they reported to her.
Merit of Lukashenka:
Belarusians in relation to the market economy turned out to be 2nd after the Swiss.
(https://news.tut.by/economics/624930.html)
"I will not lead the country after the civilized world." (Lukashenko)
“And suddenly this path was not the worst.
In Ukraine, instead of a system of paying taxes, a system of paying bribes has emerged.
We have a good bureaucracy - not subject to corruption, disciplined.
The security forces are good, they just need to actively involve everyone in the dialogue, more openness is needed. The problem of Belarus is that we do not discuss all this publicly." (Pavel Daneyko)
That is, first you need to figure it out among yourself, find and offer the best way, and explain everything to the autocrat without the courtiers - that "it is better for the Moor to leave", that now he will not be able to cope. And only with a conscious refusal to offer him to shoot himself.
An effective tool for this is the "Deliberative Network".
Lukashenka himself enters into a dialogue with the opposition - in a pre- trial detention center. You don't have to corner him.

The dictator is the weakest link in the dictatorship.
Not in the sense of murder, but in the sense that he is the center of communications of the dictatorial System.
To eliminate the dictatorial System, it is enough to switch the communications of the dictator - to an alternative System - today.
On the first hand, the possibilities for manipulating people are growing sharply. However -
On the other hand, a dictator is also a person. Why not use their own technologies - for good, not for harm ?, " For peaceful purposes."

Questions about the activities of Tikhanovskaya :

1. "Steam release":

You invite volunteers to draw posters, etc.
Has the effectiveness of this activity been measured?
Sometimes it's like letting off steam.

2. Hierarchy: Tikhanovskaya 's structures are similar to those of Lukashenka:

On the first side, of course, professional work is effective - according to positions.
But from the 2nd side, the effectiveness of "professionals" is not noticeable, and is not adequate to IT capabilities.
Tikhanovskaya 's "coordinators" created "bottlenecks" of coordination - they closed through themselves, monopolized the communication of volunteers, instead of creating fruitful flat structures.
Support and help of independence is not noticeable.
Google doesn't give any. by . ru links even at the request of the banal chaotic " Politforum Belarus "
One gets the impression that Tikhanovskaya 's associates , the "creators of civil society" are fighting - for power too.

An example of non-hierarchical , flat work that they don't support:
Belarus volunteers can communicate directly with EU volunteers so that the latter "pressure" their governments to stop financial relations with Lukashenka's subordinates and transfer them to alternative financial institutions .

Deliberative network :

Maybe some of the rebuilders are not interested in creating a reliable project that guarantees an increase in the quality of life of Belarusians ?
Like Daneyko, I also had doubts that the proposed simple solutions, such as copying Western laws, would give the expected result, and in 1990 I proposed 3 times to create an open - democratic "Deliberative structure" - for thinking and modeling . As the Russians say, "Measure 7 times".
Perhaps the main factor in the decline of protests in Belarus is not repression, but Belarusians ' doubts that the proposed NAU will give what they promise?
Indeed, in the 1990s in Russia there was an element of deliberate compromise of democratic changes.
And now there is an imitation of "nationwide discussion" - when there is no effective mechanism for discussion directly between people - someone invisible collects invisible proposals - as information for their own calculations.
The programmers who created golos2020.org could independently, without the permission of NAU, create the corresponding Network.

Lift sanctions:

Sanctions are not optimal. - They harm the "hostages" (the population) more than the terrorist authorities. It is the redirection of the blow - to the population that is one of the most effective ways to reduce protests.
On the contrary, it is necessary to increase trade, increase exports and imports for the affected country.
Only one thing is necessary - that financial flows from foreign partners do not go through terrorist structures, but go either directly - to residents - this is possible today, or through alternative financial institutions .
In this case, the physical flows will no longer be blocked by protesters, but by terrorists. And then:
a . The terrorists will have to take off the masks of defenders and defenders;
b . Terrorists will separate from other state structures;
c . Terrorists will physically oppose themselves - the entire population, including most of the state structures.

That is, it is necessary to create - an internal payment system in Euro on Mesh networks, as well.

Example for clarification:

A Belarusian producer sells cheese to a German wholesaler and sends him alternative payment details:
1. Your employees;
2. Their suppliers located in Belarus.
Suppliers located in Belarus can also transfer data of their employees to Germany.
A settlement system is being created on foreign servers.
Euros are transferred to Belarus mainly - to individuals - using alternative payment systems.
Cashless Euro circulate within Belarus - connecting with servers abroad - using anonymizers and Mesh networks.

However, it is advisable to start with the trade in virtual products and remote services in order to overcome the mass threshold, after which terrorists will not be able to block even physical traffic.

Anti-boycott :

German NGOs are organizing a campaign for the Germans to buy Belarusian - "free" cheese - instead of "bloody".

In the 19th century, democracy was established with the help of the Colt.
In the 21st century, democracy is established through the free choice of online payment systems.

Terrorist Notification:

One of the "hackers" is engaged in the calculation of terrorist performers.
It is necessary to make a legal decision and send a notification to the performers that they will not only be left without pensions, but their property (and possibly their family members) will also be confiscated, and after the fall of the regime in the Kremlin, they will be imprisoned - with a duration terms - according to the norms applied today to people who provide physical resistance to those who terrorize the population.

dw2020.narod.ru/

 

5602
06.07.21

 

The price of democracy in Belarus:

Democratic European countries are in fact not democratic, just like the pseudo- "democratic" regime of Russia, too. -
The main function of the "representatives" of the people of European countries is to deceive their voters. -
Parliamentarians of European countries support the policies of their governments.
The governments of "democratic" countries verbally abuse Lukashenka's regime, but in reality they help him.
Otherwise, if the Governments of the "democratic" countries actually sought the democratization of Belarus, they would:
1. They would establish that all Belarusian exporting companies are associated with the illegitimate government of Belarus.
They would establish that the money that European firms pay to Belarusian exporting firms is used to commit criminal activities.
Would have established that, consequently, European firms that pay money to Belarusian exporting firms commit crime too.
2. We would help Belarusians to create legally legitimate enterprises, remotely help Belarusians to carry out re-privatization .
But since for re-privatization it is necessary to help Belarusians organize electronic representative bodies, and these are European pseudo- "democrats" sabotage, then today European governments must legally register as legal exporters the strike committees of existing Belarusian "enterprises".

To carry out legitimate re-privatization, it is enough for only 2 months not to pay 1 euro cent to illegal Belarusian exporting firms, but instead to pay only directly, personally, to their employees.
1 million Belarusians working for export will agree to receive an "advance" in the amount of only 1/4 of their salary - in the amount of 50 million dollars a month - in order to hold out for 2 months - before re-privatization.
The amount of Belarusian exports to "democratic" countries is about $10 billion . (see Belarus exports - by "democratic" countries below )
Thus, it is enough to legally pay only 1% of the annual payments legally suspended for 2 months to Belarusian pseudo- " enterprises ".

For personal payments of electronic euros - it is necessary to create a payment system - independent of the illegal regime.
(see our proposals "Mutual understanding with Lukashenka")

Hungry top managers of Belarus, under the threat of legal confiscation of their families' property, will find a way to speed up the process.

These measures are necessary, including for :
To stop the flow of illegal migrants from Belarus to the EU
And also to weaken the Kremlin's position on gas diktat in the EU.

Modern IT is able to provide a fairly effective management of production - with full privatization, that is, when every citizen is an independent owner.

 

Export of Belarus - by "democratic" countries in 2016, million USD :

Poland

815

Lithuania

767

Latvia

473

Ukraine

2845

United Kingdom

1080

Germany

944

Netherlands

927

Belgium

206

Norway

107

USA

131

Italy

84

Czech Republic

85

Romania

75.2

Slovakia

69.7

Estonia

64.8

Georgia

58.1

Canada

53.8

Bulgaria

52.4

Hungary

52

Israel

45.2

France

42.7

Serbia

40.3

The Republic of Korea

34.1

Sweden

33.1

 

9 085

 

2670