Divine works


eng deu рус


Separation of investment from development:

It is not economic polarization itself that is dangerous, but the fact that money can give power.
It is optimal to reduce the power of rich people not by artificial measures, but by interacting with market mechanisms.
- The market in democratic countries makes it profitable to separate production management from investment. - Investors lose even - economic power in the enterprises in which they invest.

For project development, a flat, democratic organization is potentially more cost effective than a hierarchical one today.
Those people who are concerned about the survival of mankind should, above all, work on :
1. Creation of flat, democratic development production structures.
2. Preemptive creation of political conditions conducive to this.

It is necessary to achieve - for the survival of mankind:
1. So that investors only invest money and make a profit, but do not influence the process of its receipt in any way, neither economically nor, even more so, politically.
2. Reducing the rate of profit - with the help of the liberalization of industrial property, first of all - far-fetched "Intellectual".
3. Expansion of the "club" of investors. - So that there are no large "blocks of shares" in enterprises - owned by a few people.

However, since:
- The implementation of these measures is unrealistic in historical "democratic" countries, and even more so in authoritarian states, in which 90% of the world's population lives,
- There is little time left - before the use of highly effective technologies for manipulating consciousness - using AI,
then it is necessary to create artificial, experimental - Community in - " Arks ", resistant to technologies of manipulating consciousness.

 

Competitive use of means of production:

§ Problem:

High monopoly costs of the pseudo-free "market".
The inefficiency of the institution of bankruptcy

§ Idea:

Competitive use of the means of production instead of the institution of bankruptcy - within the framework of the concept of Liberalization of the means of production .

§ The inefficiency of the institution of bankruptcy :

The owner has monopoly control over the means of production belonging to him.
If his order is ineffective, then he is subject to bankruptcy proceedings.
However:
1. The government, as a rule, does not benefit from the bankruptcy of a large Owner and it takes measures that distort the "free" market in order to preserve the Owner.
2. A bankrupt may manipulate his property - continue to use part of his Means of production inefficiently at the expense of using the efficient use of other Means of production.

§ Those. conditions:

Reducing the cost of information processing, including with the help of AI:
- Increases the optimal frequency of changing operational users of the Production Tools :
- Makes optimal some - separation of the Means of Production from Legal Entities.
Already now there is a phenomenon of an increase in the number of enterprises that do not own the means of production, but only rent them.
However, there is no adequate institution to regulate such ownership and use of the Means of Production - on a large scale.

§ Objectivity:

Continuous competition is 100% transparent and automated. -
There is no corrupt subjective judge who decides.

§ Realism:

The method of liberalizing the means of production is far from the only way to counter the conditions of social and economic monopolization, but it is just as easy to implement and explain as the inefficient communist "nationalization of the means of production."

 

1595