Divine works


eng deu рус


Autonomous Communities, Arks of Liberty:

§ Hidden threat:

The " symbiotes " will not destroy humanity - directly. There will be no war - with certain rulers - as is usually portrayed in dystopias.
- People will be destroyed - the people themselves.
The rulers had never before fought with each other - directly. The winner was the ruler who could provide more for his supporters, as well as fool them more.
The difference in the near future is only in the endless, "singular" possibilities of fooling people.

§ The idea behind the "Arks of Liberty":

The idea of the "Arks of Freedom" is not to hide from the rulers, but from the zombie people.
However, this is only a small part of the problem. -
The main problem is to create your own societies:
1. In which there would be no social support for the " Symbiote ";
2. Resistant to manipulation by the " Symbiote ".

§ Salvation is in freedom:

Our main thesis:
The death of humanity can only be avoided if the political system keeps up with the development of technology.
And since the progress of politics is impossible for all mankind, it is necessary to create Communities resistant to manipulative degeneration where possible.
There must be a Federation of Independent Communities - because:
- Difficult to calculate stable device:
- A stable political system should be distinguished, first of all, by freedom.
The independence of the Communities must be limited only by universally recognized human rights.

The Holocaust was a great evil, but the Holocaust of humanity will be an absolute evil.

§ Demand for Free Russia Communities:

"The proportion of people who are inclined to trust other people is ≈20-25% in our country" .
https://roscongress.org/upload/medialibrary/2fa/01_Izmenilos-li-doverie-v-rossiyskom-obshchestve-vo-vremya-pandemii-.pdf

§ 2 ways to solve the "Free rider problem" ( Free rider problem ):

1. Economy of Gift, Economy of Pleasure.
2. Boycott + Openness.

§ The Dar economy exists:

Let's repeat - the Economy of the Gift (Free Labor) is work ordered not by the employer, but by the Soul, without a preliminary contract. "Payment" is made - according to the result, according to the principle "Take what you have or nothing."

An analogue of the Economy of the Gift is an auction. – There are many buyers at the auction for each finished product.
Modern IT is able to provide a very cheap "auction" for billions of transactions.

The American-Russian propagandist customers are fooling around that there is no free labor, but only hired labor.
However:
1. Personally, they work (engage in sabotage and sabotage at the devil's instigation) - freely, of their own choice.
2. The economy of the Gift appeared long before man.
The maximum share of wage labor was - in the 20th century.
Even in a slave-owning society, a larger proportion of people worked freely.
Only a minority of slave-owners and rentiers really did nothing.
- Under the influence of the instinct of pride, everyone was engaged in some kind of activity.
- Poetry, arts, robberies in neighboring countries, architecture, sciences.
The content of the work of even slaves was not 100% dictated by their masters.

In the 21st century, the share of Free Labor is growing again, primarily in countries where a living wage is provided - in the "Democratic countries".

 

2738

 

"Arks of Freedom" - Project:

Purpose of the Arks of Freedom:

The solution to the problem of migration and the Refuge are one of the functions of the Arks of Freedom, but not the goal.
The ultimate goal of the "Arks of Freedom" is the survival of a free Civilization and, perhaps, humanity in general.

The freedom to escape from the control of the zombified majority and its "representatives" is part of the inalienable rights of man - in the conditions of the transformation of humanity into psychic zombies.
In the context of the use of AI as a mental weapon, the old doctrines of ensuring freedoms and human rights, based on the assumption of reasonableness of people, turn out to be untenable.

"Arks" are necessary because of time pressure:

There is a natural tendency towards democratization.
However, it cannot be hoped for, since it is slower than the exponential acceleration of events, and will not be in time.
Therefore, it is necessary to create artificial "Arks" - super-democratic communities. - The artificial is natural to man.

Shelter :

One of the main functions of the Freedom Arks is a social and political shelter.

Currently, asylum surveys are carried out by officials of state and intergovernmental bodies.
However, their work is extremely slow and inefficient.
Example - Afghanistan - the death of many people during the evacuation of an international contingent in 2021.
The right to life remains an empty declaration, not supported by efficient mechanisms and institutions. -
Existing state and intergovernmental regulations require the provision of evidence and the passage of lengthy procedures.

Workable Mechanism Suggestion:

An international NGO leases plots of land for shelters - in democratic countries.
2 selection mechanisms:
1. The activists themselves are developing a mechanism for operational, rapid evacuation.
2. "Natural selection". - The main decision should be made by the people themselves who are seeking asylum.
- Many Afghans in 2021 would rather fall from airplane landing gear to death - $0.05/day life.

The difference between the "Arks of Freedom" and the existing camps for migrants:

The difference is that the shelters are run only by NGOs, not by government officials, as is the case now.

"Extraterritoriality":

You can use the already widely used institution of extraterritoriality.
"Extraterritoriality is the state of being exempted from the jurisdiction of local law".
/ "Extraterritoriality is a state of exemption from the jurisdiction of local law."

"Historically, this primarily applied to individuals, rather than on lands"
/ "Historically, it has primarily referred to individuals, not the land."
But today -
"Extraterritoriality can also be applied to physical places, such as foreign embassies, military bases of foreign countries, or offices of the UN".
/ "Extraterritoriality also applies to physical locations such as foreign embassies, military bases, or UN offices."
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraterritoriality)

There are also precedents for norms and institutions for :
- The countries pavilions of Venice Biennale countries Venetian biennale ;
- Maritime law/ Maritime rights ;
- International zone/ International zones ;
- Various free ports/ Various free ports ;
- Arctic and Antarctic territories;
-land _ under the Canadian National vimy Memorial / Land under the Canadian National Vimy Memorial ;
- The Saimaa Canal is partially located in Russia, but the Russian part is leased by Finland.
- Vatican.

It is only necessary to supplement the existing international norms - by a non-state actor - by internationally recognized NGOs.

The relationship of the "Arks" with the state of the leased territory is similar to those that foreign representations have. - " Arks" do not pay local taxes, do not obey local laws.
Only there is no government that these "representations" represent.

Significant deliberative, explanatory, counter-propaganda work is needed with the public of free countries for the adoption of appropriate amendments to laws.

The economic provision of shelters is not required, or rather, it cannot be a pretext for interference.
- Quite enough voluntary and private donations to support the Vaults, apart from their own economic activities.

Eligibility for expats :

By default, migrants should not be allowed to move from asylum territory to metropolitan territory.

It is expedient to rent plots of land for Shelters - in democratic countries.
- Dictators will not want "hotbeds of opposition" to appear on their territory.

Candidate States that are likely to lease sites for Vaults:

- Denmark. – Half of Greenland is uninhabited;
- Ukraine. – There are many uninhabited islands at the mouth of the Dnieper River ;
- All democratic countries have small uninhabited territories and islands.

Sea settlements:

The "issue price" is actually an order of magnitude less than is commonly believed. -
Paradoxically, a settlement at sea can be cheaper than a settlement on land. We have an economic calculation-proof of this.

Solving the problem of migration :

We offer a solution to the problem of illegal migration to Europe.
This is the creation, with the help of NGOs, of sea settlements for political migrants.
Their differences from existing camps for migrants:
1. Providing the opportunity to work.
That is why the creation of such settlements is possible only in a neutral sea and, possibly, on the leased islands of a few states.
2. "Natural selection". - The "Market" will make earnings in such offshore labor centers low, and only those people for whom it would be dangerous for their lives to stay in their homeland will move to them. “Such people will freely choose to live in poverty over the real danger of death. It will not be decided for them by some state bureaucrats.
3. Migrants will stay free. And they will have a real choice except for 2 options:
a . Risk your life or
b . Trampling on the freedom of Europeans who do not want to see migrants.
Imposing even political migrants on Europeans harms the stability of democracy in Europe, increases the possibilities of Kremlin propaganda.

Possible types of work - Here are just 20 examples:

What jobs can political migrants have?
Autonomous Economy Project.docx

Invitation of positive migrants:

Angela Merkel is right - a positive migrant is more valuable than the average German.
By "positivity" we mean not ideological, but psychological positivism.
Most political refugees are protesters - they are unhappy with something.
However, there are many people who want something better, want something good for people and the world.
It doesn't even matter if they don't know what they want.

Point system:

Usually, states give high immigration points for something that will bring them more taxes - for qualifications, age, intelligence, etc.
Is it cynical for us to use points too?
Moreover, points can be determined without any reference - not outwardly objectively, but " crazy about - objectively."
Psychodiagnostics is quite developed and reliable today. (By the way, it was the topic of my diploma).
The psychological profile of a person's interests is more important than his intellect today.

Taxes are beneficial to the states.
But for the survival of independent autonomous Communities, the desires of the participants are more weighty.
And by the way, the survival factors of the Autonomous Communities basically coincide with the survival factors of mankind.
This is also why we are opposed to compulsory taxes. - They are useless.

A high proportion of intellectuals is not necessary. Enough 2%. However, the more the better.
A high proportion of "positive" people is needed.

 

6470

 

Governments in Exile and the Freedom Ark:

Another function of the "Ark of Freedom" is the government-in-exile.
One of the reasons why the people in authoritarian countries do not win is that they have no one to transfer power to. -
The people themselves cannot organize themselves, they know that if they overthrow the criminal government, it will be even worse. And that the new government will probably be no better than the old one.
- "Revolutions are made by romantics, and crooks use their fruits."
Russians, for example, were taught this in the 1990s. - Power was seized by the Yeltsin group, which deceived the people. The people began to live much worse than they lived in the USSR before.

If there is a ready government that will present a reliable, calculated, modeled plan, then the people will probably go to the end.
Success will be even more likely if it is not a paper government in the void, but a mini-Russia, also independent.

Ukrainians should be so interested in this that it is even beneficial for them to create, despite the negative experience of Crimea and Donbass, Little Russia on their territory.
The guarantee that "New Russia" will not break away like Crimea will be its population - 100% opposition to the Kremlin, and loyal to friendly Ukraine.

Putin is right – Ukrainians and Russians are fraternal peoples. Putin is right - terrorists who destroy their friendship, like Putin, must be eliminated.

Tokayev is right when he said: "They must be killed", "Fire to kill without warning" - with a small clarification: what he said applies only to himself and his gang formation of serial killers and true terrorists.

 

1318