Divine works


eng deu рус


CSS = Community Social Science ("Deliberative Anarchist Network"):

Democratization of social science:

The survival of Mankind depends on it.

Unprofessionalism of "professionals":

Organizational factor of professionalism:

The main means of propaganda is social science.
In " democratic-free " countries, demagogy is ordered not to journalists, but to scientists.

It is scientists-demagogues who create opinions, and journalists only spread them.
In " democratic-free " countries, there are no "professional" lawyers, journalists - they all fool around just like their readers, and work in fact - against their official "customer" - the people.
"Professional" journalists do not exist - because of the narrow specialization.
Today, a lone journalist is not capable of being a professional, because he is not able to conduct full research on his own. – Today, only an organization can be professional.

Scientists are supported by kings (including businesses), not slaves.
Social scientists teach income - not from workers.
"Scientists" earn income, primarily for the fact that they act not as scientists, but as propagandists.
At the same time, the “scientist” earns several times more income than the worker.

The Science of Lies:

The existing organization of social science is quite professional in achieving its own, other goals.
It's just that her goals are not the ones that are usually declared .
Social science is not an exact science.
Economics, among other things, is not an exact science, since it is based on psychology, and psychology is not an exact science.
Social science and economics, including, are only portrayed as exact sciences - for reasons of the same demagogy. - In order to create a false public opinion that the necessity of inequality, for example, is proved objectively, mathematically.

Threats to professionalism:

Hierarchical scientific organizations are managed - not by scientists, but by politically-intellectually limited people - limited by political considerations emanating from the interests of narrow social groups.
And the more "professional" authoritarian terrorists are, the more dangerous they are for people.

Science management inefficiency:

In democratic countries, science is also controlled by parliamentary commissions.
However :
1. There is a feedback, a vicious circle - because of the game of interests. - Parliamentarians are people too, and they fool around just like the people whose interests they are supposed to protect.
2. Parliamentarians do not understand the subject better than they will understand - high-ranking participants in the "flat" Community Social science .

Control levers in hierarchical science:

1. Funding, ordering topics, research.
2. Selection of results for publication.
Monopolistic conditions for scientific publication include, among others, publishing monopolies and the Institute of Intellectual Fictitious "Property".

The idea of CSS is not to compete with scientists, but with their superiors.
Even in "democratic" countries, they are actually only executors of customers-chiefs - state or corporate.
At the same time, the “those assignments” of the chiefs are non-scientific , as a rule, and proceed from political calculations.
The idea of CSS is to engage in the field of science - the goal setting and organization of science itself.
The idea behind CSS is to make democracy scientific and science democratic, which is impossible without the other.
Democratic science can only be P2P.
See: P2P-Science Deliberative Network.docx

Monopoly inversion:

Even in "democratic" countries there is a Monopoly Inversion. -
Competition among performers, but the relative monopoly of decision-making is from above.
However, it would be optimal - on the contrary, because the general decisions are more significant than the decisions of the particular ones.
Performers should be more socially protected than bosses, who optimally should not exist at all.

Quascience :

"Rooter" - a quasi-scientific article written by the SCIgen quasi-scientific English text generator in 2008, was accepted for publication in the Russian scientific journal "Journal of Scientific Publications of Doctoral Students and Postgraduates", which was included in the list of state-recognized scientific journals.
State = quasi -science - since the assessment system in it is non-scientific .

"Democratic cut":

Example: UTS (Controlled Thermonuclear Fusion):
1. The bosses from "science" probably know that TCB will never overtake solar panels in terms of profitability, for example, but prefer not to inform parliamentarians about this.
2. Heads from "science" advertise the directions of TCB - the most promising not economically, but - the most promising for "cutting", financing the research itself.

More precisely, everything is not so bad in the "democratic" world, but these factors, nevertheless, work.

Alternative Science - CSS :

1. Gift economy:

(remember the idea):
Scientists do not obey anyone, or rather they do what their heart desires.
Donations are given to them - as your heart desires too.

2. Censorship from below:

(remember the idea):
The idea is that there is no censorship from above. -
Researchers are self-publishing only.
The essence of censorship from below is in the use of filters - according to the Google principle - the reader himself is a scientific pop , the journalist chooses whose filter to use.
Servant of the People Institute is also used here - it is not the journalist himself who creates the filter (although he is 100% free to create Filters too), but Filters are created - by other professionals - dependent only on people.

Servant of the People Institute :

(remember the idea):
- This is an institution of professional politicians-lawyers who receive income - only from specific people - directly, that is, without intermediaries - representatives, delegates.
"Institution" - means the harmonization of the relevant norms with other legislation, up to the Constitutions.

Idea Community Social Science :

Idea Community Social Science is, likewise, that the Servant of the People Institute needs to be supplemented by Democratic Social Science.
"Democratic" means:
1. Non- government . - Independence not only from the state, but also from representatives of the people.
2. Democratic organization of science.
It is believed that science cannot be democratic, since the truth is not accepted by voting.
However, under this pretext, political manipulation of science is carried out.
A vivid example is Lysenkoism in the USSR. - Most scientists were on the side of Lysenko.
In " democratic-free " countries, the phenomenon of political engagement of scientists also exists. There it is less noticeable, but that is why it is dangerous.

DAI factor:

Idea Community Social Science consists precisely in the fact that the reduction in cost and growth in the capabilities of information systems, AI - greatly increases the possibility of combining the effectiveness of science with universal participation.

New science:

What is proposed is not the democratization of the existing science, but the creation of a new, parallel science from scratch.

Themes css :

- Climate;
- Migrants, Autonomous Communities;
- Biological safety, pharmaceutical research;
- Intellectual property";
- Use of AI , Use of "Big Data";
- Counter-propaganda;
- Elimination of nuclear weapons;
- Gift economy;
- Self-organization of the Deliberative Network. – This topic should be 1st in both senses.

The climate theme will be the most popular, and therefore the basis for building CSS , although it is also the least important.

- "Technological collapse"
"Democratic propaganda" extols the possibilities that "capitalism" provides for the development of technology.
However, monopolistic corporations conduct technological research focused on application only in cancers of their organizational forms.

- Information decentralization
Her research should have both directions:
1. Organizational and economic;
2. Organizational and social.
- Alter Lawmaking
- Non-violent legislation

Stagnation of technologies:

Why don't system technologies develop, but only private ones? Why is there no 4th industrial revolution?
Huge reserves remain unused - in all sectors of the economy. -
Because scientists and engineers are excluded from system solutions.
Because the Patent system is focused only on private solutions.

Probabilistic planning of technological development:

In strategic planning for the development of applied, technological sciences, the approach that seems unscientific at first sight is optimal. – An approach that is not based on evidence, but on probability.

Evidence, including experimentation, was the foundation that gave rise to science itself and the Industrial Revolution.
Evidence is the basic principle of science.
However:
1. Evidence hinders the development of science - on a large scale - precisely today - when science has become much more complex compared to the science of the beginning of the Industrial Revolution.
2. Evidence makes the evolution of science - random, similar to the evolution of the animal world, which is based on random mutations.

In nature, there is a "liberal" principle - everything that is not forbidden is allowed.
On a large scale, natural science must be based on a similar principle.
At the present stage, the optimal strategy for the development of science should paradoxically be similar to the pre-scientific one .

On the one hand, the experimental evidence approach has become many orders of times more expensive today than in the 18th century.
EXAMPLE Electrical research and controlled fusion research.
On the second hand, numerical, computer simulation, numerical experiment have become quite complete and adequate to nature.
On the 3rd side, it is numerical modeling that allows estimates of the probabilities of obtaining a result, complex - physical and economic estimates and estimates of reserves.

"Reserve" approach:

The development of technology, for example, the 20th century could be quite easily predicted - based on the gap between "theoretical limits" and real achievements.
There was no need to anticipate private technological solutions.
It was only possible to assess the feasibility, the possibility of using unused reserves.
Assessment of the possibility, the probability of the implementation of reserves in different directions - should become an independent science today.

We propose an approach focused on - organized collective search based on the hierarchy of the subject of science instead of the hierarchy of the organization of researchers.
The approach of Gorbachev (the leader of the USSR who initiated "Perestroika") is to look for opportunities, not justifications.
Whoever wants to hear will hear.

As specific technological directions, we offer a number of examples that at first glance seem to be unscientific "projects".
However, these are just proposals for research directions, and not proposals for patent designs.
These examples are:
- Real Starship Concept.docx
- Selena 's X whip concept
- Concept WIG on
- Thermonuclear concept U Speed Power Plant
- Concept Aerobike
- Concept Glass Road

 

Alter Lawmaking :

In "democratic" states, lawmakers -parliamentarians are not involved in lawmaking.
The real law-making in them is carried out by "analytical" centers, which are maintained by the "capitalists".
These same "independent" centers are also developing demagogy for "brainwashing" of "cooks " - parliamentarians.
State and pseudo- "independent" think tanks have a conflict of interest.
"Independent" research should either be done free of charge or paid only by P 2 P workers, with prioritized development of mechanisms to ensure their resistance to propaganda.

Democracy is the separation of politics from economics.
Today, real Democracy is the conditions for the survival of mankind.

More efficient:
1. Not from scratch to come up with non-violent legislation for the Autonomous Communities, but to use as a basis the legislation of the most democratic states.
2. Experimental sociology - on the basis of the same Autonomous Communities.

The defeat of the theory of communism does not mean the victory of the theory of "capitalism".
Mainstream liberal-democratic theory does not ensure the sustainability of Civilization in the era of using AI as a weapon.

Sunset of mathematics:

Mathematics played perhaps the biggest role in the Industrial Revolution. -
Without the development of mathematics, the latter would simply be impossible.
To some regret, but the importance of the human science of mathematics is now declining:
1. The possibilities of numerical modeling are not comparable with the methods of analytical mathematics.
Yes, mathematics is widely used in programming too.
But her role in this can no longer be called the leading one.
2. AI will become capable of human mathematical constructions. And better people.
That is, mathematics as a science will not die. “It will only die as a human science.
Analogy: Hand weaving is not dead. – It remained as a hobby, as a sport.
Only its polit-economic significance has died.

Request for logic:

However, social demand for one area of mathematics will increase. This is mathematical logic.
AI, of course, will help in it.
However, a person should not leave this sphere to the machine - completely. -
AI should be used here only as an auxiliary tool.
I repeat, the reason for this is not a possible "revolt of machines", but their use by man against man. More precisely, not quite a man - against people.

The demand for abstract thought will only increase.
However, the direction of abstract thought will no longer be mathematical, but traditionally philosophical.
There is, in a sense, a return to prehistoric logic - the logic of survival.

Imagination factor:

The factor of imagination has become the main one today - for the effectiveness of science.
Due to the growth of opportunities and the reduction in the cost of IT , traditional logic and intelligence have become less significant.
- Collective cooperation between developers and researchers, and process modeling allow you to effectively interact, effectively use any, even "crazy" ideas and achieve good results - even in the absence of strong intellectuals in the community.
- The presence in the community of participants with a good imagination has become more significant.

 

11953