Divine works


eng deu рус


Technological factor of democracy:

Bringing democracy from the outside is ineffective, examples are Libya, Iraq.
More effective - technological assistance that promotes democracy.
Micro-missiles are a technology that directly contributes to democracy.
This idea appeared 20 years ago, but the military does not implement it, despite the technological availability, not because the Koreans are stupid.
- This is an argument that the democratic effect of this weapon weighs even more than a competitive military advantage.

However, NGOs in democratic countries, first of all, should be concerned not with the development of Micro-missiles, but with the following questions:
1. Examining the sustainability of flat organization; An experimental test of the principles of self-organization of the population and procedures for the participation and interaction of shooter- volunteers.
2. Proactive adoption of laws:
a. On the prohibition of the use of Micro-drones and AI to kill people, even terrorists.
b. About the openness and accessibility of Micro-rockets.
- For example, in the United States, freedom of ownership of weapons remains, despite the regular massacres. Non-lethal Micro-Missiles have too many advantages over killing weapons, so it will be difficult to ban them.
c. About their free circulation in the world market, and, most importantly, about free sale to the population of non-democratic countries.

Firearms have been the guarantor of democracy until now.
However, today micro-missiles should become the guarantor of democracy.
There is no need even to seek a general ban on murderous weapons - so that not only the population, but also the troops do not use them, since the weapon will die off a natural death, unable to withstand the competition with micro-missiles.
It is only necessary to create in advance the legal environment for the `` flat '', decentralized use of micro-missiles.

§ Environmental equivalent:

There is no need to push for a ban on coal-fired power plants, it is more efficient to eliminate duties and barriers to the sale of solar panels at cost, as well as to organize an infrastructure for the exchange of electricity over long distances.

§ Jewish export of Micro-missiles:

Jews are interested in democratizing Iran and Syria.
Democratic Iran and Syria will be less aggressive towards Israel.


Democracy was called "very good" or "quite good" system of government - in Tehran

91%

Government support by the people in Tehran

15%

Sanctions against Iran are backfiring.

& nbsp;

USA

Iran

Work for a full-time company

44%

7%

At the same time, Americans do not like Iranians.

§ Micro Missiles and Korean Drones:

South Korea's Defense Acquisition Program Administration (DAPA) creates a 'weapons platform' UAV for mounting a rifle or grenade launcher on it. -
The North Korean brothers you intend to kill will not understand this approach.

I propose an alternative - an open nongovernmental development of a P2P network of non-lethal micro-missiles.
If you choose it, the North Korean brothers will not think that you are also ruled by the dictators who organized the massacre of you in Gwangju, since the flat network of micro-missiles is a truly democratic tool that should be controlled by a self-organized population, not by rulers. < / p>

§ Other benefits of Micro Missiles:

+ Sharp reduction in threat from North Korea.
The best value for money implementation of technological excellence today.
+ A sharp decline in mortality from the use of weapons in the United States while reducing crime.
Optimal is not to try to fight the weapon, but to displace it with a non-killing agent, moreover, a more effective one.
The P2P micro-missile network is a distributed network of both surveillance and firing micro-batteries. Volunteers, including foreign ones, are automatically alerted and connected when violence is detected anywhere.
+ Reducing misunderstanding of the police by the population - by reducing its use, as well as by preventing its misuse of violence.
+ Accessibility of controls - all young people in South Korea have the experience of playing shooter s , unlike North Korea.
+ Use of Micro-missile complexes for targeted delivery of In-ear headphones.
+ The weight factor for flying drones is more significant than for a foot soldier.
Considering the factors for drones: vulnerability; maneuverability; speed; the presence of Achilles heels on the target; cost; increase in efficiency and reduction in price of immobilizing drugs, -
- more profitable: reduce drones; bring them closer to the goal; reduce trunks for sub-sonic needles on them.
The same Drones carrying micro-batteries of micro-missiles with the same damaging effect will be an order of magnitude lighter, and an order of magnitude more tenacious due to stealth.
+ & quot; Soft & quot; cheaper faster than iron.
+ An alternative to developing a centralized AI for weapon control.

If it is not possible to democratize the Civilization of the Earth, then its death is likely in 400 years, while the Earth is unique not only in Our Universe, but also in the Universe.

Flat Micro-Missile Network and Hierarchy:

Proudhon proclaimed: `` The worker is the owner of the thing he has produced. ''
Until now, it has been a utopia. -
Let's say an employee wants to sell a thing he has produced. -
He will simply be shot if he is persistent.

§ Why was there a hierarchy?

In Honduras, an unemployed person prefers to join a gang rather than to get food alone.
- In battles when dividing territories, the larger gang wins.
States are the same gangs that organize world wars.
Organization is needed to fight for territory.
The hierarchy has been the most effective organization for this.

§ No lag:

However, today IT allows you to create flat organizations that are superior in efficiency to hierarchical ones.
This is a hypothesis based on indirect evidence.
Until now, anarchists have been engaged in theory.
Today they are obliged to experiment in view of the fact that henceforth the Hierarchy creates not just `` exploitation '', but - a threat to the existence of mankind.
Moreover, due to the acceleration of history, practice must keep up with theoretical possibilities.

§ Favorable factors:

1. Re-miniaturization of technologies:

1. In the energy sector. - Solar panels have become cheaper than large power generators.
2. In production. - "Microprocessor revolution" (reduction in the cost of automation bodies) made micro-production more profitable than large ones, especially in authoritarian states, in which the largest part of the price is the corruption component.
3. In agro-production. - Agro-machines. - Genetic engineering has made small-scale micro-industries more profitable than large ones.
4. Creative 'production':
a. Its share in the economy is growing due to the lag in its automation.
b. Liberalization of intellectual property profitable.

That is, on the one hand, the efficiency of the organization of the people themselves increases,
And to meet it, the size of the competitive structure is decreasing, while it is easier for people to organize in a small structure.

2. Reducing resource dependency:

Including:
- from the ground,
- from energy sources.

3. Reducing Violence:

Wars have become unprofitable:
2.1. Unprofitable,
2.2. Too destructive.

Propaganda replaced violence.

§ The Utopianism of Anarchy:

The reason for the utopian nature of industrial democracy is not so much in its economic uncompetitiveness compared to a hierarchical organization, but in the fact that a hierarchical organization provided more effective violence.
(“94% of 226 studies found that employee participation and profit sharing improved productivity.”)
The authoritarian countries were characterized by high economic inequality.
Therefore, even if a democratic `` collective farm '' had labor productivity, for example, 2 times less than a company owned by a terrorist close to the central government, then its employees could still be profitable to work for themselves.
(“The recent uprising against neoliberalism in Argentina included the seizure of closed jobs.”)
However, such a `` collective farm '' was not beneficial to terrorists, as it created competition and increased labor costs.

Democratic collective farming was inefficient in the 19th century. -
Example: Russia, 1905, Stolypin's reform:
For 1000 years, the peasants lived in a completely democratic `` Community. ''
And they continued to work as in the 18th century.
Government reforms created competition, in particular, allowed to buy up land.
Enterprising fists applied advanced technologies, including the organization of production.
They paid more taxes than the feudal landlords and collective Communities.
The reforms of the tsarist government were pragmatic.
With free economic competition, hired workers often lived richer than the communal peasants, who continued to live according to the Malthusian law (an increase in the number of peasants in proportion to an increase in yields). - Even though entrepreneurs were taking an increasing share of the wealth.

The communists added competition - political - ideological, populist.
The ideology of the Communists is the state = the firm.
The 'collective farms' created by the Communists they were not. They were just divisions of the state = firms.
After 50 years, the subdivisions are "collective farms" went bankrupt due to the lack of freedom to buy and sell, as well as economic responsibility.

At the same time, there was a `` hybrid '' with the USA society:
Parties promoting the ideology of neo-'' liberalism '' and monopoly firms.
That is, there was limited propaganda, and limited competition and economic freedom.
And since nothing more effective existed, the United States turned out to be the economic and political leader in the world.

However, the Marxists are still right that the changing technological situation is shifting the organizational optimum.
Although the communists themselves did not find the optimum for Russia in 1920 and did not intend to find it, since they were only concerned with the power.
In general, the organizational optimum is a purely theoretical model, since the rulers are interested in it only for the purposes of political competitiveness.
Here it is also viewed as a means, but a means - for the survival of mankind.

Today instead of `` raiding '' and terror of peasants, scammers predominantly organize institutions of `` licensing '' and & quot; certification & quot ;.
Moreover, the fooled workers themselves legalize these institutions on fictitious `` democratic '' elections.
The propaganda costs of fraudsters are paid off by the growth of their profits and power.
Today, the effectiveness and profitability of propaganda is constantly growing - thanks to IT.

§ Today is a hybrid, transitional period:

- Police violence is used simultaneously with propaganda, which is ineffective before the advent of psychic AI.
It is necessary to have time to create a replacement for the police - self-defense in the form of a flat network of non-lethal micro-missiles. Create using AI too, but simpler - non-psychic.

The same IT allows us to oppose organized violence - also organized - flat self-defense.

§ Advisory Network and Micro-Missile Network:

The Micro-missile network can be created, however, only in conjunction with the Advisory network, otherwise, it is really possible to use it inadequately.

§ Feminism and the Micro-Missile Network:

It is desirable that the operators in the transparent Micro-missile Network are predominantly women.
Women protect life in life, men destroy it.
See: The Role of Feminism in History.docx

§ Not for the sake of money - for the sake of life on Earth:

It is necessary to break the vicious circle and deprive the public manipulation of funding not so that workers get more money - today, but in order for them to survive - tomorrow - physically, because, firstly, they degrade without violence, and secondly, the era of non-violence itself will last only 300 years - until the moment when manipulation becomes 100% reliable, and it will be possible to launch a counteroffensive even on formal liberal democracy - by the hands of degraded people themselves.

& nbsp;

2020-2021