Divine works


eng deu рус


Nonviolence and Micro-Communities:

Locations of Nonviolent Micro-Communities:
Micro-communities that do not use violence for legal relations - can develop - within and on the territory of democratic states.
Preferred location of non-violent Micro-communities on the outskirts of democracies - for maximum autonomy.

Benefits:

& quot; + & quot; External protection

Possible options:

Greenland,
Alaska
Islands of French, British Polynesia.

Violence and the Ark of Freedom:

Is a society without violence possible?

On the first hand, for thousands of years there are thousands of examples of such societies.
These are monasteries, many religious and not only communities and communities.
Even international relations can serve as such an example, especially after World War II, especially between democratic countries.
On the second hand, almost all such examples are not inclusive, independent communities with full-fledged economies and family relationships.

Violence hypothesis:

The central hypothesis of the concept of the Ark of Liberty is the assumption that violence is the main cause of economic lack of freedom, monopoly and, accordingly, economic inequality, and polarization of society,
which in turn is the reason for the formation of groups of people interested and able to manipulate other people - with the help of AI,
which, in turn, may cause the death of mankind in 300 years.

Time trouble:

After the development of AI tools for psychic manipulation - in the middle of the 21st century, the role of violence in maintaining the polarization of society will decrease in authoritarian states as well.
However, this field will be almost impossible to counteract polarization - the process will become irreversible.
Therefore, it is necessary to create free communities - in a narrow time period.

Social Experiment:

The purpose of the Ark of Liberty is an experimental study of the possibility of a nonviolent society.

Law and Anarchy:

Counts. that the Rules cannot exist under Anarchy, since the implementation of the Rules is ensured only by violence.
However:
1.``Compelled '' may not be violent, but due to cooperation and moral pressure from the participants.
2. The function of explicit Rules is similar to the function of writing - for example, it would be somewhat more difficult for computer builders without written documentation to cooperate.

An example of the power of non-violence - Religion:

The Pope has no divisions, however, the papacy is stronger than Stalinism. - 1000 years ago the kings of Europe obeyed the Pope, today billions of people listen to his recommendations.

Rules without hierarchy:

Outside of religion, in the economy, however - if there is no violence, police, then there will be no centralization, there will be no hierarchical structure.
All participants are interested in having uniform Rules.

Compliance without violence:

A decrease in usury, exploitation, monopoly and vows of loyalty does not mean that production is impossible.
On the contrary, today, with the help of IT, even more effective cooperation of independent people is possible.

Democracy and Anarchy:

Modern democracy has many disadvantages.
However, the best form of government, or rather, without Newspeak - “form of organization”, is also democracy.
Democracy cannot be replaced, only improved.
Anarchy, like democracy, has many forms of organization, intersecting with many liberal democracies.
When improved, liberal democracy moves closer to anarchy.
Anarchy is the best democracy.

Provocateurs:

The main problem of modern communities is agents provocateurs of the special services of authoritarian states.
Moreover, this problem did not exist in the previous communities.
100% nonviolence seems to be really impossible - today.
But nonviolence is not an end in itself, but a means of reducing the polarization of society.
Accordingly, it is necessary to look for ways to achieve non-violence - as a means.

Methods of countering provocations:

- without the use of active physical violence against the provocateur personally:
1. Undocking:
In a maritime settlement made up of `` family '' `` Houseboats '' undocking from the provocateur's house is possible.
This is one of the advantages of the sea settlement option.
2. Towing the House of the provocateur.
- Further, for example, to the territorial waters of the state that sent him.
3. Removal of weapons of violence and burglary and other means from the House of the provocateur - with the help of Avatars - by the decision of the Community (see Advisory Network).
4. Passive self-defense. - Protection against intrusion and attack - for example, using the P2P-Network of non-lethal paralyzing Micro-missiles.
5. Involvement of violence services of neighboring democracies - by prior arrangement.