Divine works


eng deu рус


Libertarian Socialism and the Ark of Freedom:

Social justice is irrelevant today - when the threat of death looms over humanity.
Nevertheless, social justice is most relevant today - as a means of saving humanity from destruction.

Humanity is in danger of death - from the use of psychic political IT technologies.
The reason and consequence of the use of polit-IT-technologies will be the growth of social polarization.

Egalitarian libertarianism is the best way to prevent the growth of social polarization and manipulation of people.

The Trap of Communism:

Communism compromised socialism.
At the same time, communism showed experimentally that socialism is impossible without freedom.
- Bureaucratization and degeneration of a society without freedom is a universal law of nature.
Trotskyists declared Yugoslavia (Tito), Poland (Gomulka), Cuba (Castro), China (Mao) - either true communism or Bonapartism.
However, workers' democracy is impossible without the instruments of democracy - both institutional and instrumental (The Advisory Network).
Trotsky, like Marx, neglected the details of the devil.

Communism fell into the trap of simplicity - preventing the economic polarization of society - by nationalizing the means of production.

However, there is a directly opposite way to prevent the economic polarization of society - through the liberalization of the means of production.

The Capitalism Trap:

Liberal democracies are not.
“There is still a high degree of monopolization of economic conditions and associated political manipulation.

Time trouble:

Today, one cannot only hope for further liberalization and democratization of existing states, since the accelerated development of psychic political-IT technologies is already beginning to outstrip this process.

Ark of Freedom:

The main direction should be the creation on the territory of existing liberal-democratic states - libertarian communities, living according to their own economic laws.

& nbsp;

Special free economic zones:

These are zones that do not have special economic laws - of a given state, but free economic laws - of the Zone itself.
It is necessary to organize a social movement, for example, in Denmark or in Ukraine, which would achieve the adoption of a law allowing the creation of zones with economic laws adopted by the communities of the Zone.

& quot; Ark & quot; - Your life:

The USA is also a historical phenomenon. They cannot meet the aspirations of every person, that is, every American.
There are many US laws that Americans disagree with.

For example, this is the terrorist & quot; Anti-Terrorism Law on Livestock & quot; USA 27.11.2006 HR4239
“If protests cause losses to livestock businesses, protest activists can be jailed.”
This law is not anti-terrorist because:
1. Not directed against eco-terrorists, but against ordinary zoo-defenders.
2. The concept of "eco-terrorism" expanded in the spirit of Newspeak Orwell.
This law is terrorist in that it serves to intimidate US citizens who are fighting clear evil.

There are a lot of similar US laws. There will always be US laws that any US citizen disagrees with.
Isn't it better to live by your own laws?
Yes, the legal field is very difficult, but you don't even try to master it.
Founding Fathers The United States was also independent. Follow their example.
It's much easier for you than for the founders of the United States. - You have the Internet, very effective information tools that allow you to use all the accumulated knowledge and help to harmonize laws among themselves.

The United States may be more democratic than today's Russia, but is it necessary to participate in the production of weapons of murder of ordinary Russian people?
Creating an alternative to dictatorship is much more effective than force pressure.
Plus, pressure is very risky today.
However, the very process of competition between power groups is even more risky - with the use of modern political technologies.

The average difference between the aspirations of Americans and Russians is much less than the difference between the aspirations of the Americans themselves.
Yes, in Russia the GOPG (state organized criminal group) of Putin is hostile to the Russians, it just uses them. But the social contrast in the United States is not far behind Russia.

Is it advisable to fight against someone at all? Wouldn't it be better to leave alone those with whom you disagree and just constructively create what you think is right and necessary?
And today it is not just necessary, but perhaps the only chance of human survival.

What is needed today is not a fight against Russia, and not even help Russians in the fight against the most dangerous terrorists in history, but help Russians in creating an alternative - Free Russia - not on the territory of Russia.