Love for Russians. Big Blowjob:
Love is stronger than hate.
Love is more powerful than hate. Especially today in the digital age.
It is more effective not to kill Russian soldiers, but to help them and their families - informationally, legally, by all means. Help to be free.
Russian soldiers are victims of total spiritual rape in childhood.
Terrorists knowingly use soldiers - almost children. Yesterday's schoolchildren still learned to think independently. And it is not in vain that in the schools of the Russian Federation they do not teach legal self-defense, primarily from the state.
Love for Russians is hatred for Putinism , because Putinism cunningly, cunningly, cynically and vilely makes Russians enemies of themselves, their relatives, makes Russians zombies.
Love for Russians is measured by the number of murdered Putinists who are responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands of Russian young people.
Help the Russians instead of war with them:
The idea is not to fight the Russians, but to help them, and really help them - in the interests of the Russian people themselves. -
- Help - in counter-propaganda and organization. -
- There are no independent media in Russia? –
Invest in satellite Internet that broadcasts directly to smartphones - more than on weapons and salaries for the military - since the first factor of victory is more significant.
- In the Russian Federation, independent organizations are impossible, is society atomized ? -
Help create Russian "people's" parties based in Ukraine.
Purely pragmatically, in order to defeat the Russian people, it is necessary to kill 20 million Russians and the same number of Ukrainians.
The alternative is not to sacrifice the Ukrainians at all, but only to help the Russians deal with their traitors.
This is a classic tactic - to send some, good "Russians" against other, bad Russians.
This tactic is used by the "Russians" themselves - by inciting scoundrels and traitors = Kadyrovites against real Chechens.
So did the Americans when they genocide the Indians.
But unlike the Indians and Chechens, the victory over the "bad" Russians is beneficial to the Russian people.
Moreover, the ratio of forces is not 1:1, but 99 to 1.
Why, with such a ratio, the Russians themselves do not change their rulers? - The reason is propaganda, disorganization, etc. It's a normal story that goes on all the way. history.
The most effective defense against the Russians is to help the Russians:
Namely:
We must help the Russians build a prosperous life for themselves.
What is needed for this:
1. Develop a Program.
The path to an increase in the standard of living of Russians is objectively outside the policy of Putinists , outside the war.
We just need to find the best way and open it to the Russians as much as possible.
2. Create an organization.
Help is needed to establish an effective government in exile.
With the help of satellite internet, even before the military assistance of the Ukrainians, an effective government will be able to really help the Russians improve their privacy through teleworking and tax evasion ..
"Russian Ukraine":
Even if Ukraine fails to "return" the Donbass, then it needs to be created.
Moreover, we must not wait for the liberation of Donbass and Crimea, but their creation immediately.
For example, near Kiev, for example - in Pripyat. – Where Russian-speakers are treated most tolerantly in Ukraine.
"Russian Ukraine", a successful alternative to the "Russian World" is the most terrible weapon against the Putinists , this is what the Putinists started the war because of .
Option 1 - "Endless" war against the "Russian world" and the death of 1 million Ukrainians;
Option 2 - Demonstration of a prosperous Little European Russia - this will be a real argument more effective than any words, and the challenge of the Maidan in Moscow.
An idea is the best weapon:
The 1st option is to kill 100,000 Ukrainians and the same number of Russians in order to seize the Crimea, which the Russians will consider to be their native land.
The second option is to "export" to the Russians an idea that will revolutionize Russia, and Crimea itself will fall off from it.
The idea of European integration, which captivated the Ukrainians, will no longer be able to captivate the Russians - it is too weak and not well-founded .
However, the Russians will probably be captivated by the "divine" idea of Flat Democracy.
Moreover, this idea will be useful for the Russians themselves - in contrast to the previous idea of Communism.
That is, both Ukrainians and Russians will benefit. Except for the Putinists .
Moreover, export is the best. That is, the idea must first develop - in Ukraine itself.
Social contract:
In particular, it is possible to help the Russian people develop a "Social Contract" - not an abstract philosophical one (by the way, this concept is erroneous and demagogic), but a legal one. -
- Prescribe even in the Constitution of Russia - the principles and algorithm for the distribution of state. budget - In particular - that income from the export of natural gas, oil and other minerals from the bowels - be spent only for social purposes, or simply paid to all citizens.
One this measure already:
1. Save income from the export of hydrocarbons, because otherwise Europe will actually refuse to import from Russia. – There are several technological options to address the volatility of green energy. “Idiot Russians just don’t see them.
2. Stop the death of the sons of Russian mothers in wars. - It is not profitable for Europe to make Russians poor with the help of military force. That is, reducing military spending for the Russians is not just savings, but a significant profit from trade and Western technologies.
It just needs to be explained to the Russians with the help of counter-propaganda and help organize a people's party that will kill Putin's terrorist leaders.
You can even help the Russians with holding electronic elections and referendums.
Big suck:
We must not keep the Russians out of the West, but, on the contrary, spend $ 1 trillion to lure them there, since the risk of nuclear war is more expensive, and sucking soldiers in the era of the Internet and direct satellite communications is the best way to prevent it.
Recruiting should be the main military strategy today.
Visa-free for Russians in Europe and Ukraine:
The Russian agency in the Government of Ukraine maintained simplified visa procedures for Russians after 2014, lagging behind even the Baltic countries in visa policy.
On the other hand, what is needed is not the abolition of visas for Russians, especially for young men, but, on the contrary, the abolition of visas.
But it should be - a special visa-free , more precisely - a special free visa.
Most likely, the travelers will have to increase military mobilization, even if hidden, and at the expense of contractors . ( this essay was written mainly on 07.2022).
It is better to lure the maximum number of young men, for example, to Finland - now, than to kill them at the front later.
1 decoyed pre-mobilized from Russia is 1 non-killed person in Ukraine.
The special nature of the visa-free regime is that the condition for entry into a Western country must be the passage of a counter-propaganda course with a series of psychological tests for dezombification .
The course of counter-propaganda can begin as early as in the Russian Federation - online , and continue throughout the stay of a Russian in Europe. Expulsion from the course means the loss of a visa.
During the Covid -19 pandemic, quite a few people agreed to spend 14 days in quarantine to travel to another country.
"Psychological quarantine" can be much milder - it may not interfere with the normal life of Russians in Europe.
It is also necessary to take from the "tourists" consent to the disclosure of their position that they are the enemies of the Putinists .
You can still take a subscription not to return to the Russian Federation until end of the war.
In the Baltic countries, of course, "superfluous" Russian-speakers are not needed - even Putin's enemies who want to assimilate.
But in many other countries they would prefer Russians to Arabs and Mexicans.
The criterion is simple - it is more profitable to keep a Russian soldier in Canada, in Alaska, than in Donetsk.
It is more profitable to spend 10 million on his maintenance than 10 million on his murder.
Western NGOs could push through petitions, for example, in Canada for the internment of fugitives and dissidents from the Russian Federation, and in the Baltic countries and Finland for their transit. - If we wanted effective, and not visibility, activities according to the state order or the order of the Kremlin.
There is a bet on collaborationism - the most profitable strategy:
Even if temporary emigrants do not fight against Putinists , the desire to return to Russia and not go to jail for 15 years will be an incentive for active work, for example, in counterpropaganda.
The difference of this war is that Russian collaborators are not traitors.
On the contrary, they are fighting against the traitors of Russia.
Therefore, with advanced dezombification , there will be no less active Russian collaborators than active Putinists .
Enemies of Ukraine - behind:
How many lives and money are spent on killing 1 Russian soldier? - 1.1 soldiers of Ukraine - in July 2022.
Wouldn't it be more profitable to pay $10,000 to a soldier not of Ukraine, but of the Russian Federation, if many of them are not motivated? "The Russians burn their soldiers. Most of them were tortured or executed for not following orders from their superiors."
Instead of making assistance in surrendering one of the main strategies, those who voluntarily surrender are also tortured and all are kept in custody.
- Because it is beneficial to the military authorities of Ukraine.
Prisoners are treated badly in Ukraine now - according to inadequate legislation.
This is sabotage and sabotage.
Zombies must be lured in every possible way and help them go into "captivity".
Developing strategies for safe passage into captivity is more important than military strategies for killing these zombies.
For example, much more labor hours are spent on dezombing a Russian soldier and his relatives than on killing him.
At the same time, they inform him - what he will receive in Canada, and about the general plan for the defection.
Then I liquidate the command staff of the Russian Federation on the front - with the help of Micro-rockets , and at the same time they specifically instruct the soldier - how to run across.
Those soldiers who did not dezombize are immobilized and taken away by remote- controlled quad bikes or the like.
Purely pragmatically, the prisoners are almost as valuable a resource as the Ukrainians themselves.
These are the same people, even culturally close, who just happened to be in the wrong place at that time.
Hatred is beneficial only to the authorities and traitors to the Ukrainian people.
If I'm wrong, then also write - what exactly, please. I would be very grateful.
Next in importance to developing strategies are strategies for actually dezombification .
Prisoners must watch TV, with effective counter-propaganda - around the clock.
And only after that they go by weight - military technology. To get rid of wars, unfortunately, one has to fight.
For 20 years, parents put all their strength into the child, teachers at the school worked on educating his complex spiritual world. And then, unexpectedly, this young man, who did not have time to learn anything on his own in the world, kills Ukrainians and martyrs himself.
Maximizing P 2 P contacts between Ukrainians and Russians is the best, cheapest, most humane way to stop the massacres.
It is much more efficient to work not on killing the Russians, but on having the Russians kill the terrorist leaders. -
Nuclear terrorists who took not 8, but 8 billion hostages and illegally zombified 140 million can be destroyed by any means. They were not supposed to return from an overseas summit.
"Deviant", ("Neutral", "Pacifist"):
It is necessary to introduce the legal concept of "Deviant" - in addition to the concepts of " prisoner of war " and "defector" (one who went over to the side of the enemy).
"Deviant" is someone who does not want to kill people, considers murder a criminal offense, it is also someone who wants to remain neutral, someone who does not recognize the law on mandatory = forced mobilization.
In international and state law, a similar concept is already used - a deserter.
However, the legal use of the latter concept is somewhat different.
More adequate is the application of norms for people who do not want to kill - for religious reasons.
It is only necessary to make this right-use more universal and independent of religious beliefs.
Perhaps the term "Neutral" or "Pacifist" would be more appropriate.
The term "Pacifist", however, now also carries a narrower semantic content.
" Prisoner of War " is an enemy who remained an enemy, but chose to save his life.
"Neutral" is not an enemy, even if he retained the citizenship of an enemy belligerent state.
However, it is possible to apply the requirement of renunciation of citizenship - after an application for recognition of the status of "Neutral".
The rights of the "Neutral" should be incomparably broader than those of the " Prisoner of War " up to the preservation of personal freedom.
International legal norms should be developed for "Neutrals", including the ways in which they can safely leave the state of which they are citizens.
For example, "Neutrals" should not be subject to a ban on obtaining exit visas, rather the rules of "Stateless Persons" should apply to them.
The concept of "Neutral" is also useful for the legalization of "Flat" communities.
Philosophical education is the basis of counter-propaganda:
Effective counter-propaganda should be, first of all, systemic education.
Propaganda is based precisely on the ignorance of people. -
Propagandists easily "confuse" Russian people with demagogy, arguing, for example, that the United States is also an Empire, that there is no fundamental difference between the political systems of the Russian Federation and the Federal Republic of Germany.
Education is not knowing a lot of information that today can be instantly learned using Google .
Education is scientific thinking. This is not only the ability to have and defend supposedly "one's own" point of view, but also to understand the essence of scientific concepts that propagandists like to use. This is critical and analytical thinking. It is the ability to understand the arguments of different political and philosophical systems.
The Soviet man was well-read, but not educated - he knew only one thing - the communist system. The purpose of the spiritual violence of the "Russian World" school is to educate freaks who are unable to perceive alternative opinions.
That is, before creating a deeper immunity to propaganda, it is necessary to develop a method for removing a more primitive but effective immunity against counter-propaganda.
Captivity instead of killing:
On the 1st side, non-lethal weapons (Network Micro Missiles) are more cost-effective than lethal ones today.
On the 2nd side, captured zombies are more profitable than dead ones, since they can be de-zombified relatively cheaply, including since the Truth is on the side of the Ukrainians.
Zombie soldiers are only half to blame. It is very difficult for an intelligent person to resist modern psychic technologies.
It would be fair to give - equally - 1 million zombies for 10 years of work, and 1 terrorist leader 10 for a million years. - To make Kashchei immortal, especially since the Leader himself dreams of it.
"Red phones" - for fools :
In the ancient world, communication between the elites of different states was difficult.
But today, in the era of affordable telephony and satellite communications, too - the issues of war and peace are decided - by the Presidents of the United States and the USSR - by the "Red Phone".
This is very unreliable and dangerous.
In the ancient world, soldiers were actually slaves.
Agreed among themselves - only the rulers.
When they said "Persia" they meant "Shah".
Today, in part, too - when they say "USA" they mean "State Department", when they say "Russia" they mean "Putin".
The rulers-beneficiaries of "democratic" states are also satisfied with this situation.
People in "democratic" states perceive this traditional delegation of their rights and responsibilities, instead of direct action, as the only possible one.
However, they need to think about the possibilities of P 2 P -connections to increase the stability of the world.
In particular, in order to prevent a nuclear war, flat communication between Western PNOs and the military and other people in the Russian Federation related to nuclear weapons is extremely important.
Derussification is sabotage:
Derussification is stupidity:
Sheep are shown a "red rag", and they happily throw themselves at it, harming themselves.
Yes, the unity of Ukrainians is needed now.
But we need the right "platform" of unity.
De-Russification and even "patriotism" cannot be a "platform" for unity. -
Stupid Ukrainians are not given clear guidelines as to where the enemy is.
And their enemy is actually behind them.
The rulers of the Ukrainians, for example, cynically - under patriotic slogans gave the Russian Federation and the gas fields of the Poltava region.
The enemy of the Ukrainians is not the Russian language, it is not Pushkin's fault, but the Russkiy Mir.
The rulers of the Ukrainians are in the "Russian world".
Simple and clear criteria for the "Russian World" are needed.
"Russian world" - is: non-transparency , non-freedom, monopoly. -
- The authorities should not issue licenses, be able to create a shortage of fuel, for example. "There are 500 fuel trucks that can buy and bring a resource . "
The fact that there will be a shortage of fuel in Ukraine was clear on February 24th. But instead of the freedom of decentralized distribution of tank farms . advantageous traffic jams of fuel trucks at the borders were organized.
"Russian world" - is: non-democratic . -
Ukrainians must make their own decisions - instead of the rulers.
Foolish sheep were set on a red rag - a red flag, communist symbols.
But we must clearly and clearly separate the "grain from the chaff." -
Harmful in communism - dictatorship, monopoly, destruction, lawlessness.
The useful thing about communism is democracy - "by one's own hand".
For whom do Ukrainians die? - for the "Russian world" for now.
Who are the Ukrainians killing? - really brothers, deceived, but brothers.
Yes, if a brother has gone mad, he must be neutralized. But don't hate. A madman needs to be de-zombified.
Putinites spending on propaganda increased several times more than on the war.
And the enemies in the government of Ukraine, instead of organizing counter-propaganda, are "muddying the waters," too.
"People's Participation":
Yes, the people should not participate in politics.
"Participation of the people" in politics is an appearance, a scam . "Politics" is a scam .
People must make management decisions - at all levels, of any depth.
"Participate" should, on the contrary, - "professionals" - without the right to directly make decisions, even operational
IT today makes it possible to implement a corresponding 100% transparent structure of coordination and independent enforcement of the law - more efficient than even the European public administration structure.
Decline of Imperialism:
Imperialism is a deep cultural tradition.
The whole history of all mankind was won by that culture in the broadest sense, which attracted more people to its side.
People also always followed the stronger one, whether he was right or wrong. – Demagogy as a justification for force is as old as humanity itself.
Today, however, this law may be violated. – Today, in the IT age , not the group that unites more people may be stronger, but the group that is more effectively technologically organized.
If in the 19th century 100 Great Britons could kill 10 thousand "Papuans", then today this ratio can be even higher. Moreover, killing people today is not even optimal for victory.
The factor weight of weapons today has become incomparably higher than the factor weight of tactics.
Accordingly, the role of " nerds " - developers is incomparably higher than the role of field commanders today.
The optimal organization of IT - " nerds " - is flat, in contrast to the traditional hierarchical organization of field jocks.
Also today, the factor of volunteer enthusiasm has grown significantly. It replaced the traditional - compulsory forms of organizing "cannon fodder".
the Putinites themselves , I repeat, unlike the past main baboons, are not patriots of Russia. – Russians are the same enemies for them as the Ukrainians.
Putintsy -patriots only power. They use patriotism only as a manipulation - a surrogate for ideology.
Mexican or similar the plan will not stop the war -
- the Ukrainians are determined to take revenge and win,
- for the Putinists, the surrender of Crimea is like death,
- the Russians are too zombified by propaganda
There was only one way to reduce the victims of the war - technological, direct.
The spontaneity of wars:
So far, wars have arisen spontaneously.
Popo-liss - " historians" greatly exaggerated the role of kings. -
- King-rulers were only triggers, using and directing the spontaneous desires of the human masses.
The instinct and culture of war is one of the strongest in man. -
- If you do not kill, then they will kill you, and it is more effective to kill with a crowd.
- Only those clans and cultures survived that were able to unite in order to be the first to attack and kill their neighbors.
Even in the 20th century - the pseudo-intelligent Germans spontaneously developed a collective hatred and desire to kill the Slavs, and the British - to kill the Germans.
God is still lucky that a single Empire on Earth has not been formed.
God is also lucky that the person turned out to be intelligent enough to understand, for example, the above theory and communicate with other nations and religions.
So it has been until now.
However, from now on, the role of the rulers becomes really 100% - thanks to their use of super-AI .
Solovyov people are ineffective. Individual bots are 100% effective - "nightingales".
Great European stupidity:
Useful idiots in Europe justify their ban on the entry of Russians by the fact that "let the Russians fight against Putin in Russia, and not run away from him."
This is a completely non-scientific approach:
Among the deserters, almost no one will fight against the authorities.
But in Russian Ukraine or in Ossetia, they will be able to inflict no less damage on Putin than even with weapons in their hands.
And the number of deviators who, after a course of counter-propaganda, will still take up arms will be no less than the number of deviators who will have to take up arms while remaining in Russia.
The Russians are touchy - you don't let us in, you don't leave us a choice - it means you yourself want us to fight against you.
That is, the choice is simple - either 1 million young men fighting against the Ukrainians, or also 1 million young men fighting for the Ukrainians.
Maidan and Maidan supporters need to be prepared for Moscow, and not to hope that it will arise by itself, as in Ukraine - the luck of History usually does not repeat itself.
You can't leave children with an inadequate nuclear neighbor.
Maidan in Moscow is the best guarantee of Ukraine's security.
Helping the Russians build "Free Russia":
See also:
POLIT RUSSIA \ Sanctions against Russia \
Sabotage Suction Denial of Asylum Dissid RF Synopsis.docx
POLIT UKRAINE \ War of the Russian Federation - Ukr \
Captivity Deviators Sabotage War of the Russian Federation Ukraine Abstract.docx
POLIT RUSSIA \ Foreign Relations of the Russian Federation \
Agents of the FSB of the Russian Federation in the World Synopsis.docx
" Konnor ". http : //dw2020.narod . _ _ en /
18184
|