Mailing to US Senators:
Distribution of the Appeal for the Prevention of Nuclear War
Letter to President Biden:
It is necessary to send out - now - for case of an attempt to use nuclear weapons - to all persons of RF related to nuclear weapons - individual Appeals. (The CIA must have contact information of all of these individuals.)
These Appeals must be built - individually - so that they are read.
Applications must contain:
1. Explanation of the motives of Putin and his entourage.
2. Explanation of the personal responsibility of the addressee,
3. Obligations to minimize damage to the population of Russia and to Russia itself by the United States,
4. Ways to verify the fulfillment of these Obligations.
The appeal should be, if possible, frank, unambiguous, honest, open, "straight".
Something like:
"We don't want a nuclear war and the death of Russians.
But we consider it necessary to change the leadership of the Russian Federation, since the former leaders of the Russian Federation are serious criminals, they created a threat to the lives of billions of people, and they are unrepresentative.
When the leadership of the Russian Federation changes, we undertake to minimize the damage to the population of Russia and make efforts to preserve the integrity of Russia.
You will be able to control the veracity of this commitment of ours in the following ways:
…
If we follow these Commitments of ours, we also invite you to refrain from participating in the use or escalation of the use of nuclear weapons.
We will not try to disarm you. We just want this criminal leadership of the Russian Federation to be replaced by a democratically elected one."
If possible, it is necessary to disclose the general plans to change the leadership of the Russian Federation.
As a rule, it is not necessary to offer monetary "encouragement" to recipients. Most of the recipients are patriots.
A nuclear war can cause - a misunderstanding.
Politicians in the United States judge by themselves - they believe that Putin will not dare to provoke a nuclear strike on Russia.
But, the Russians for Putin are even greater enemies than the Americans.
Therefore, the Americans should negotiate not with Putin, but directly with the Russians.
2nd measure to prevent nuclear war:
Provide the Russian Federation with a collective guarantee of the liquidation of the entire leadership of the Russian Federation - without a statute of limitations, on any territory of the Earth, without investigating involvement - in the event that the Russian Federation uses nuclear weapons.
"Konnor".
I am enclosing a few of my letters to the Ukrainians as well.
27.09 - 02.10.2022
Christmas Peace Initiative:
I propose organizing a campaign to send letters from ordinary Americans to ordinary Russians, primarily to relatives of soldiers.
Organizers:
Anti-war activists, US Senators.
Why should letters be from Americans?:
The Russians were told that their main enemy was the United States.
The idea is to organize counter-propaganda - in the USA:
What will Activists do?:
They will send out proposals to ordinary Americans;
They will provide feedback to those who respond, who agree to participate in this Campaign. And they will resolve all issues;
They will forward the propaganda arguments that the participants will receive from the Russians to political scientists, or they will prepare the Counterarguments themselves.
Profitability of counter-propaganda:
It is counter-propaganda that is the main front of the war today.
It’s not for nothing that the Kremlin’s propaganda spending has grown many times more than military spending – because it is more effective than military spending.
Accordingly, if the US spends $0.8 trillion on military spending, then they should spend $2-3 trillion on counter-propaganda.
Counter-propaganda is the most effective way:
to reduce the risk of nuclear war, and
to reduce the economic consequences of the war in Ukraine - for the Americans.
Search Engine Counterarguments:
- It is necessary to create a convenient search engine for finding Counterarguments to any Argument of the Kremlin propaganda.
Desirable, also an AI-assistant tool for the participant - for quickly formulating personal Counterarguments.
Flat organization:
It is also advisable that there are no permissions for the actions of activists, so that the activists do not obey anyone, but interact horizontally, based only on the Protocols of interaction with which they agree and which they themselves can develop.
Obtaining permits will reduce efficiency as it will slow down and de-motivate participants.
The flat system of counter-propaganda will be more effective than the "Russian" propaganda system, despite the fact that it will be an order of magnitude less expensive.
Russian-speaking participants:
It is also advisable that Russian-speaking opponents of the war in Ukraine be involved in this Campaign.
For example, about 50% of the Ukrainian population speaks Russian.
Message content:
"We do not want war, we are afraid of the escalation of the war."
"What should we demand from our Government?" – This question stimulates a dialogue in which the participants will be able to expose the deceit of the Kremlin propaganda – with the help of ready-made model counterarguments that they will take from the Counterargument Search Engine
Video messages:
It is also advisable that participants send not text letters, but video messages, video stories about themselves.
- Let them speak English, it is important that the Russian recipient of the message make sure that the sender is a simple American, and not a propagandist from Washington.
Whatsapp messages:
It is also advisable that Video messages be sent mainly not via Email, but via the Internet communication tool - via Messenger, which is used by the Russian recipient in everyday life.
Constructive Suggestions:
Example: Peacekeeping contingent:
"Let's demand from our governments that they withdraw troops from Donbass.
Let instead of the Ukrainian and Russian troops a peacekeeping contingent be brought into the Donbass - from those neutral countries that the Governments agree to - Russia. USA and Ukraine.
For example, such countries can be: Armenia, Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua, Syria, Eritrea, North Korea, Iran.
Let the troops of Russia's allies be brought in, more importantly - if:
there will be a cease fire;
Russian troops will be withdrawn.
The main thing is that the Iranian soldiers should obey the UN and the Government of Iran, but not the Government of the Russian Federation.
The US government will agree to pay Iranian soldiers the same as it paid its soldiers in Afghanistan.
Peacekeeping troops can be brought in through a port on the Sea of Azov, for example, through Mariupol."
"Konnor"
23.12.2022
3435
Christmas Peace Initiative. Counter-propaganda instead of killings:
(To Orthodox Christmas).
Stopping the war in Ukraine is simple:
The war will stop, the Russian troops will be withdrawn from the Donbass - as soon as the support of the war by the population of Russia becomes less than 50%
To reduce support for the war in Russia is quite realistic too. - Through counter-propaganda.
Advantages of counterpropaganda:
1. Counter-propaganda does not kill anyone, unlike the supply of weapons.
2. Counter-propaganda against war is easier than propaganda because counter-propaganda against war is more true.
For example, the Law on National Minorities of Ukraine will ensure enough rights for the population of Donbass. This European Law will work, unlike the laws of the Russian Federation.
The population of Donbass will stop suffering from the war. By the way, it suffers more from the Russian army than from the Ukrainian army.
Ensuring the rights of the population of Donbass can be strengthened by the UN peacekeeping contingent..
3. Counter-propaganda is easier to scale than building weapons factories.
There remains only one explanation why a wide active Counter-propaganda is not used - killings are more beneficial for the rulers and the military-industrial complex of Western countries.
4. Counter-propaganda can be distributed predominantly - by anti-war volunteer activists - P2P.
There are 10 times more activists in Western countries than there are paid propagandists and trolls in Russia too.
Undifferentiated propaganda is less effective than personalized counter-propaganda.
Constructive counter-propaganda is the best way to maintain political stability as well.
In particular, the Russians themselves can be invited to support actions in which the nuclear weapons of the Russian Federation remain controlled, and at the same time the quality of life of the Russian population will improve.
Losses due to the war in Ukraine only for European countries, only in 2022, only because of the energy crisis caused by it, exceeded 1 trillion. dollars, but the overall economic losses are much higher.
Experts predict the prolongation of the conflict - for years, and the aggravation of the problems caused by it.
The crisis generates a decline in the standard of living of the population and social instability.
Therefore, investments of even 2-3 trillion dollars are profitable - to end the war.
The most effective way to end the war is counter-propaganda.
It is even possible not to spend money from the state budgets - it is enough to include counter-propaganda - in Tax Relief Laws like Section 848A and Schedule 26A Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 (TCA). and remove all restrictions on their use.
Cost-effective is the Movement's initiative: "Investing in counter-propaganda instead of taxes"
The economy of Western countries exceeds the economy of Russia - 10 times.
The Russian regime will not survive the propaganda-counter-propaganda race.
A large share of the costs will go to creating a constellation of orbiting satellites. similar to StarLink-2, but more powerful. - Which will be able to send a signal to the mobile phones of Russians without the use of additional equipment.
StarLink technology has already been worked out too.
1. "Jammers" at 5 GHz are unprofitable.
2. Even conservative pensioners in the Russian Federation will want to use free half-duplex internet.
War today is keeps on propaganda. If the Russian regime loses in propaganda, then the war will stop.
"Konnor"
07.01.2023
The danger of arms supplies from China to Russia
Distribution to US Congressmen 28.02.23
Hello.
Putin has a way to win the war.
If Putin does not "win" the war, he will die.
The use of nuclear weapons does not pay off. Putin's entourage will not allow him to use it.
But Putin still has a chance to "win" the war - set up so that China will sell him 1 million chips for mini-loitering munitions - through the 3rd country
Putin is not a military man, but a KGBist. He could not calculate the military factors, but he would be able to arrange it.
The main military factor that prevented Putin from conquering Kyiv is Javelin anti-tank missiles.
The era of tanks ended with the battleships. - An anti-tank missile is 100 times cheaper than the tank it killed. Tanks "Leopard" will not help the Ukrainians either.
The US made the mistake of demonstrating to Putin the effectiveness of the Switchblade.
The West has not accepted China's Peace Plan, and China will be forced to help Russia bring peace to Ukraine. China is losing money, so it will take the risk.
The US CIA has information that the Chinese leadership is considering the possibility of supplying weapons to Russia.
It is necessary to get ahead of Putin and organize the production of non-lethal shooting cruise micro-missiles in Poland.
"Konnor"
|