The power of freedom:
Return of freedom:
Is democracy worth such sacrifices?
Isn't it time to get a return on democracy, for which so much blood is shed?
We admit to ourselves that Ukrainians aspire to Europe not so much for its values, but for the opportunities that freedom and democracy bring.
Moreover, on the 1st side, the potential of freedom and democracy and Europe itself is far from realizing
On the second hand, one cannot expect the EU to solve all the problems with corruption, the oligarchy - instead of the Ukrainians themselves. - On the contrary - the EU does not accept Ukraine, because. waiting - when first the Ukrainians themselves will change the System in Ukraine.
You can't wait for your politicians to do it. - You can't figure out a cynic-politician by the spoken words.
Poroshenko , for example, sold Ukraine - under patriotic slogans.
You can't wait for scientists or bloggers to point you in the right direction.
– 90% of scientists work in a hierarchical state system and receive a salary there.
Bloggers, on the other hand, are divided and have income from efficiency, not from economic results, but from beautiful words.
The factor of freedom is more significant than the factor of money:
A very simple rule of thumb:
Russia spends ≈ 10 times more money on the war than Ukraine. Approximately 50% of the money goes to people.
In addition, the state organization in Ukraine is worse than in Russia. Traitors and foreign agents, in particular, are ≈ 10 times more.
However, Ukraine is winning.
It is believed that he wins - because of patriotic motivation.
But this still needs to be explored.
- We believe that no less, if not a greater factor - independence, initiative, freedom. - "Maidan" pays for itself.
Patriotism itself is 50%, if not more, based on the internal freedom of Ukraine.
- If Putin had attacked the Ukrainian "Putin", then they would not have fought for the latter , as they are now fighting.
However, he would not attack - an ally-dictator is more profitable - "a crow will not peck out a crow."
"Strong" Ukraine:
"Strong power" is one of the demagogic devices.
How is Ukraine's strength measured? - The ability to eliminate the terrorist leaders of the terrorist organization "RF", denuclearize , demilitarize the latter and denazify the neo- racist Russian nation.
But for this there should be no monopoly of political power in Ukraine.
It is the political monopoly that has been the cause of the poverty of Ukrainians so far.
"Russian world" does not work:
It is not enough that degenerative tech give. tasks for the creation of aircraft of the 6th generation, but expensive aircraft created on command do not work either.
The paid demagogy in the Western world is not much inferior to the demagogy of the "Russian World".
Fortunately, in the free Western world, demagogy can be successfully defended by relying on the interests of no longer hierarchical corporations, but associations of free groups of independent developers.
"Checkers or go"?
Ukrainians should not just copy the European system of Startups , but look for maximum efficiency.
The meaning of the Maidan was precisely in the removal of obstacles to this.
Ukrainians pay for the ineffectiveness of weapons with the lives of their children and fathers.
The benefits of freedom incl . that one does not interfere with the other. – Let Zelensky bring the Laws of Ukraine in line with the European ones . Poroshenko said the same thing, however, he often did the opposite. Zelensky may be a hero and a god, but he does not implement what he says at all - personally. And even for his centralized team there is an objective systemic conflict of interest. "Democratic" T-shirt means nothing.
The best thing Zelensky can do is to ban his Interior Ministry from fighting Ukrainians.
We will not interfere with Zelensky in those of his attempts that are not harmful to Ukrainians. We'll even help. But don't let him get in the way.
Factors of imperfection of the European system:
1. Intellectual contrived "property":
This is also a monopoly as in the "Russian World". The most effective is property liberalism. Non-monopoly schemes for obtaining remuneration by authors are possible , without intermediaries. Prohibition prohibition is effective.
See: Property Liberalization and Liberal Socialism.docx
2. Centralized investment:
For 200 years, the West has sought to reduce "cuts". But he didn't get it. His aircraft carriers are billion-dollar floating coffins, easily destroyed. The price / quality of its missiles is overpriced - by an order of magnitude.
The path of Europe Ukraine is not something that will go 200 years - with modern poly-technologies, it will go - in the opposite direction - to the "Russian world".
The uniqueness of the situation in Ukraine is in public investment.
2/3 of Ukraine's budget comes from Western "sponsors". The lion's share of this money comes from taxpayers, people.
The concentration of power and money is the non-efficiency of the "Russian world".
must not allow Ukrainian developers to receive money - through state intermediaries .
IT today allows organizing cheap mass P 2 P flows.
And IT -developers are the strongest in Ukraine.
Today - a unique situation - defense technologies in Ukraine can be stronger than in the United States.
Moreover, the creation of military production in Ukraine itself is not the optimum.
There is an optimum - developments in Ukraine, and factories - in the EU.
Social experiment - there is the best payment to Europeans for their help.
What do we offer? -
Self-organize directly social, flat social science.
Moreover, to get the return from it in the 1st stage - in defense.
In the 21st century, the main factor of victory is not on the battlefield, but in science.
RF is a colossus "on feet of clay". She has a lot of weapons and resources.
But dictatorship, which seems to be its strength, is in fact its main weakness.
- Startups don't work in a dictatorship. Team science is not competitive.
At the same time, the defense industry, in particular the Micro-Missile Network, is the best way to guarantee the freedom of intellectual "property".
Free grouping of developers:
Lack of Hiring:
In the Western world, developers are hired. – The creator of a startup selects – performers – for himself, taking into account the requirements: investors, patent laws, lobbyists in the Ministry of Defense and in other instances, etc.
Yes, workers choose their "employer" too. But their relationship is very asymmetric - because of the wide and deep monopoly affecting all spheres of states.
This monopoly does not have to be eliminated - it can simply be circumvented.
It is IT development that is different:
1. Weak dependence on the physical means of production.
2. The ability to independently create virtual production structures, societies and institutions.
Developers can simply engage in their favorite hobby, without entering into relationships with any "employers", but only communicating with each other - horizontally.
And at the same time jointly obtain competitive products.
Socially necessary products are invented not by investors, but by developers.
Now it is possible to create a search engine focused on search - each other, and not performers, as in LinkedIn .
Now it is possible to create a system of P 2 P sponsorship, sending all authorizing authorities after the Russkiy Mir ship.
Small Groups of free developers, in turn, can also freely interact with each other, without looking at anyone, forming large, just as flat structures, and competing with Boeing and Northrop corporation .
National idea of Ukraine:
It is in Ukraine that now there is an opportunity - more free, with fewer restrictions - to create more effective structures.
In particular - developers can group - freely, independently, non-hierarchically.
A transitional situation has now arisen in Ukraine, when there is no need to immediately create the institution of end buyers-investors without intermediaries-monopolists-concentrators of assets. – 75% of “investments in Ukraine are now actual donations with very loose conditions and a significant delay.
Lack of government reforms:
There is no need for any political revolutions and even reforms that impose some kind of laws on entire countries.
- Developers may well live by their own laws - only themselves.
With democratic states, one can only have contractual relations - instead of subjugation and propaganda "social contract".
Do you think competition with Northrop is a utopia? Corporation ?
Then just advise, please, those who believe in freedom.
Glory to Ukraine
" Konnor ". http : //dw2020.narod . _ _ en /
7000
Maximum development:
See also: Force of freedom.docx
Idea:
Finding optimal solutions at the development stage.
Conditions:
Strong reduction in the cost of computer modeling and other information capabilities - remote communication, organization of effective interaction of a large number of people, etc.
What was tested in hardware in 10 versions in the 20th century is possible today - to simulate with 1000 iterations - to find the optimum.
Importance:
An error at the design stage can cost 1,000 lives, and conversely, an effective solution can "save" 1,000 lives.
Conditions:
Growth of opportunities. – For example, if in the Middle Ages the “continuum of possible solutions” was limited, today, due to the growth of possible materials and technologies, it has grown by orders of magnitude. In the "continuum of possibilities" there are effective solutions that the Kremlin's hierarchical developers could not even dream of.
The main condition-opportunity is organizational freedom.
The goal is to realize the opportunities it provides.
If the raw material resources of the Russian Federation exceeds Ukraine by 5 times, then Know - how -opportunities provided by organizational freedom, Ukraine surpasses the Russian Federation by 10 times, conditionally.
How:
Without state structures.
With the help of state structures that still belong to the "Russian World", a qualitative superiority over the Russian Federation cannot be achieved.
It is necessary to interact with the state, but:
1. On your own terms;
2. At the scaling stage. The Ukrainian state is still very effective in organizing production.
True, the optimal place of production is probably the Baltic country.
Problem: Implementation model today:
Hundreds of enthusiasts invent alone, for example, different drones .
Dozens manage to make a copy in hardware.
A few manage to break through the state bureaucracy, and then, years later.
far from optimal solutions manage to break through the state bureaucracy.
Alternative Parallel Model:
Create a convenient large information environment in which the same hundreds of enthusiasts can effectively interact to identify optimal solutions - at the conceptual stage.
And when enthusiasts see the effectiveness of a parallel organization, then thousands more will come up - American and other enthusiasts.
At the same time - to create our own large crowdfunding system in which the whole world can participate.
The US state, for example, is rich at the expense of Americans. If the US government can raise $100 billion , then the Americans themselves can raise $1 trillion,
Flat development:
The first optimal solution that can be found is finding the optimal = the most effective organizational structure, the conditions for which are described above.
The 2nd optimal solution that can be found is to find evidence of the profitability of investments in development and production.
That is, it will be possible to attract investments much more than the Ukrainian state attracts today.
Moreover, direct public investment in an optimal (=100% transparent, P 2 P ) organizational structure will be used much more efficiently than "cutting" money in the hierarchical structures of the "Russian World", to which the Ukrainian state also belongs.
The Ukrainian state does not fight against the people, and thanks to him for that. More precisely, thanks to the "Heavenly Hundred", their sacrifice should not be in vain.
There is a sense to fight - not for the Ukrainian state, but for the Free Ukraine.
Freedom is not a whim, but endless possibilities, efficiency, and power,
which is able to eliminate all Putinist propagandists and their sponsors until they liquidate Humanity.
" Konnor "
31 81
Labor productivity:
The idea is to increase the productivity of military labor through the use of technology.
Analog:
In civilian production, investment in machinery is more profitable than investment in labor.
The physical volumes of production are growing - precisely due to the growth of labor productivity.
Military "production" in this respect does not differ from civilian production. -
The idea is that investing in equipment is more rewarding than investing in people.
And, most importantly, in this case, people are saved as a consumable resource.
Let's say the army of Ukraine = 100,000 people.
Military spending = 20 billion $ / year
Of them:
Spending on people \u003d $ 10 billion / year \u003d $ 100,000 / (year * people)
Expenses for 10 people = 1 million $ / year
Equipment spending = $10 billion/year
1 fighter of Ukraine neutralizes the 1st terrorist of the Russian Federation.
If you reduce 5 people. out of 10, and invest the released costs in equipment, then the remaining 5 people will neutralize not 10, but 20 terrorists.
With the preserved ratio of losses - per 1 spent Ukrainian fighter
will be neutralized .
|