"Deliberative network" - Technological purpose:
Problem: Narrow specialization:
Corporate economists in Germany are tasking engineers to improve the fuel efficiency of gas-fired thermal power plants ( Heat and Power Plants ).
Engineers "scratch out" 0.5%, focusing on utopian - stable operating conditions for thermal power plants, including constant power consumption.
This increases the profitability of thermal power plants by 0.5%.
But then:
At night, power consumption drops. Because of this, profitability also falls by 10%.
Russia cuts off gas and profitability drops immediately by 100%. To prevent profitability from falling, electricity prices are increased by 100%
Ecologists do achieve the closure of thermal power plants. Investments are non-refundable. As a result, electricity prices are rising again.
However, all these trends could well have been foreseen.
But corporate economists simply didn't need it. “They're only fighting—for relative profitability—with respect to competing corporations.
If gas prices rise, then for all corporations. The price of electricity is absolutely of concern to corporate economists.
"Deliberative network" - Purpose:
The "Deliberative Network" is focused precisely on the complex solution of problems - in a social "key".
" Seed " ideas :
Moreover, I offer concrete "seed" ideas, "concepts" for the complex development of the "Deliberative Network".
Example: See: Heat Storage Project Power Plant \Ground Heat and Electric Storage Concept.docx
Open Development:
Problem:
- Monopolization of patent law.
Intellectual "property" today is the main basis for the concentration of economic power.
The concentration of power, in turn, today is the main threat to the existence of the Free civilization, and probably to the existence of Mankind in general.
Idea:
The legal field has already included the application of numerous varieties of GNU -patents, allowing the free use of a particular Intellectual Property, while "by inheritance" prohibiting the free use of any variations that use it.
" CopyLeft " and the traditional Copyright have already "get used to", and are widely used together.
The idea is to "stake out" the free use of all major areas of scientific and technological development with the help of Open Development, and thus defeat the Intellectual monopoly without revolutionary reforms, and prevent the death of Mankind.
Plan:
Create a Flat Network Open Community on the Internet, in which participants could engage in free scientific and technological development on the principles of the Gift Economy.
Flat - the absence of positions, which is the monopolization of administrative functions. Inventions are not made by bosses.
Open – No permissions to participate. At the same time, various recommendations and manuals for effective participation are competitively developed.
The gift economy is the absence of contracts. Financial support for participants will be provided not on the basis of the execution of contracts, but "post factum" - based on the results of free search developments. At the same time, there is no organizational body concentrating financial, etc. funds, and the decisive one is how much to pay to whom. – Financial support will be determined by – multiple sponsors – directly – P 2 P .
Ukraine:
A unique situation has now developed around Ukraine:
The ruling factions in the USA and Ukraine, in order to defeat the ruling group of the Russian Federation and eliminate the nuclear threat to their assets, will adopt a tolerant attitude towards the Flat anarcho scientific and technical communities.
This is a chance to create, grow and develop social forms that lack the concentration of power and money and are thus resistant to degeneration by using Super-AI as a manipulative weapon.
There is no bad without good:
The war can make Ukraine an exporter of technology to the US, Japan, Germany.
An ideal situation has been created in Ukraine for the emergence and development of a Flat Economy.
Analogue: The theory of the origin of biological species through the movement of ecological niches (see our corresponding theory of the 1990s).
First of all, these are the factors:
1. Sponsorship instead of product orders.
2. Enthusiasm.
Putinites are growing an army that is absolutely superior to the hierarchical army of the Russian Federation.
Field of study:
In the superiority of today's complex, advanced technologies, the learning factor is leading.
At the same time, training developers in Ukraine can be an order of magnitude cheaper than European universities.
Weapons developers in Ukraine are interested in sharing all production secrets with accomplices. They are not interested in monopolizing knowledge:
1. The amount of sponsorship for them will not increase,
2. Developers' products have a very narrow scope.
3. Targeting of P 2 P -sponsorship;
"Professional" simply will not get more money if he hides the secrets of his skill from accomplices.
4. For the majority of developers in Ukraine, winning is more important than personal earnings - today.
The main factor in the price of university education is the price of secrets.
In cheap Russian universities they simply teach - of little use .
Secrecy:
On the 1st side, the advantage of flat development lies in the absence of monopoly, that is, openness, but
On the 2nd side, the area in which flat developments have the greatest advantage in Ukraine now is the military.
This contradiction is resolved with the help of the same Flat interaction - non-concentration of information. -
The results of private developments are not submitted to the "boss" in the absence of such. Secret information is not concentrated at all. No one even has lists of developers on the net.
Instead, developers exchange the necessary information - P 2 P - with subcontractors.
Participants personally know subcontractors, they know who can be trusted.
Of course, there are members who specialize in security.
But they help other members - P 2 P , too.
If state -terrorists get secret information, then it will be fragmentary and indefinite version.
" Konnor "
3932
About the benefits of "Delirium", "Delirium" and "Deliberative Network":
It's about the psychology of creativity.
To come up with something new, more effective than the existing one, one must allow "crazy" ideas.
Another thing is that one must be very educated in the subject area of inventing - in order to immediately cut off erroneous directions of thought.
At the same time, in the era of the Internet, it is possible to form even simultaneously with the process of inventing - there would be a desire to study university textbooks and scientific articles.
Traditionally, collective creativity is organized with the help of specialization and hierarchy . -
- Each participant is responsible for a separate detail of a large development, and the "tasks" are determined by the higher "developers".
However, as the subject areas become more complex, the efficiency of the hierarchical organization of development is greatly reduced.
This is due to the fact that the number of connections of "details" and the number of "dimensions" of the space of options are greatly increasing.
The idea is to make the collective process of inventing similar to the individual . -
When a person thinks alone, then he does not form permissive levels, and various taboos and prejudices only interfere.
Potentially, the effectiveness of inventing, especially in a complex subject, can be increased almost in proportion to the number of participants.
The main psychological problem here is pride. -
- In people in a hierarchical environment, a reflex of criticism associated with pride develops hypertrophied.
We see 2 ways to compensate for the problem of self-esteem:
1. AI - search engine of unanimous people;
2. Procedural AI -assistant - helping conflict-free communication of people.
The creation of such an AI assistant for "flat" creativity is the idea of a flat "Deliberative Network".
1500
|