Divine works


eng deu рус


Legal Ability Relativity:

The concept of Relativity of Capacity must be introduced into the legal field now.

Example #1:

You are driving down the street, you see a girl and a man. The girl screams - "They rape, kill, help!" You knock out the man. You get 5 years in prison for this. It turns out: A man bribed a girl, a judge and a prosecutor to put you in jail.
Are you really guilty?

Example #2:

They tell you: “Terrorists settled in that house and crucified Ukrainian children. There is no one but terrorists in that house. There is no one to shoot at that house except you. I take full responsibility.”
You shoot.
Who is guilty - you, or the one who took all the responsibility . ?
All your fault is that you did not organize an independent verification of information during the time pressure when the terrorists threatened to kill other children ..

Example #3:

Is the terrorist guilty? -
In the Chernihiv region , a fighter was caught who was trying to save women and children from the Nazis. He saw with his own eyes, on videotape, how a woman called out to him - "My child was crucified by the Nazis, save us!"
The fighter was given 5 years in prison.
The woman was either an actress, or even an animated picture generated on a computer.

Proof of the incapacity of a "reasonable" person:

In one village in the East of Ukraine, on the one hand, 89% of the inhabitants would like to live in the EU and 71% - in NATO, on the other side of the village, the desires of the inhabitants are radically opposite.
(www.kiis.com.ua/materials/pr/20220920_o/August 2022_wartime survey Public fin UKR.pdf)
The only difference is that the neighbors happened to be at the time of the survey either on the territory of Ukraine or on the occupied territory.
Moreover, the scientific representativeness of the surveys is really high, the error is ≈ 0.5% with a high confidence level.
Due to various factors , Donetsk residents who want to join NATO may not be 71%, but 70%.
One factor, one reason gives such a drastic change in people's opinions and desires - propaganda and manipulation of the circumstances of their lives, in which it is beneficial for people to have a certain opinion.
And this is achieved even without the use of super-AI
After the application of super-AI, the real freedom of choice will simply disappear - completely.

People in Ukraine trust the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the least democratic institution - by 91%, but do not trust the Verkhovna Rada (19%), which they allegedly elected themselves.
Kucheriv Democratic Initiatives Foundation and the social services of the Razumkov Center )

Putin is right - democracy is a fiction, from now on:

Putin proved the instability of democracy in practice. -
At the turn of the 20th and 21st centuries, all the formal signs of democracy were present in Russia.
However, using political and legal manipulations and propaganda, the Putinists were able to bring democracy in Russia to complete degeneration.
Yes, in Russia there were historical prerequisites for the degeneration of democracy.
However, with the development of mental AI will become unsustainable - all democracies that have been sustainable so far.
Probably the only way to avoid "Managed Democracy" and preserve a free society is only one kind of democracy - Flat Democracy.

And who are the judges?

In the 1st Example, the guilty, probably, in fact - the one who "ordered" you, as well as the judge and the prosecutor, who legitimized the violation of the Law.
The issue is complicated by the fact that the judge and the prosecutor can even be quite conscientious, a bit formalists.
The problem is that highly-professional highly intelligent lawyers in 20 years can be relative morons - relative to manipulators using psychic AI.
Already today, half of the judges of the Russian Federation are "led" to brainwashing - by ordinary people, just as judges were "led" in Nazi Germany in 1939.
Yes, everything is not simple here - there is a complex game of personal motives and group interests.
But that's the problem - this game has endless possibilities! - up to the full zombification of people who retain all the formal signs of rationality.
The problem is that people today are not able to imagine endless possibilities. super-AI in the hands of manipulators.

Who is guilty?

Are incapacitated zombies guilty?
Even if he killed, trying to save someone, to free.
It is probably more legitimate to approach him as a person with limited legal capacity.
100% of the fault lies - on the organizers of zombies .
Moreover, terrorism and massacres are only their 2-step crime.
Their main crime is a threat to the existence of mankind.

Paradoxically, the terrorist leaders are not condemned even in absentia, they are not appointed for their heads, for their elimination - a trillion dollars - the threat is worth this money.
After all, these leaders are formally legal.
The question is the need to supplement the illegitimacy of the "rigging" of elections with the illegitimacy of zombification of voters.
It is necessary to develop formalisms, procedures and criteria for "informed consent" and choice.
It is necessary to study poly t- "systemic" measures to counter zombies .
Such a measure, in particular, may be a movement towards "flat democracy".

It is not zombies that need to be destroyed, but propagandists and developers who turn people into zombies.

Captured "terrorists". What to do?:

In accordance with the doctrine of "Relative Capacity" "terrorists" - the latter must not be killed, but captured and de-zombified, just as today they try to immobilize a madman so that he does not harm either others or himself.
Why is one killer recognized as insane, and the other is not.
This discreteness is completely unscientific, not to mention the fact that the politicized theories on which the "experts" rely are far from being scientific either.
In the near future, the concept of "insanity" will be equally applicable to "experts", judges, as well as to all other people.

Profitability of non-lethality :

This is not "good, unrealistic philosophizing." -
Paradoxically, today non-lethal "captivity" is more cost-effective than murder.
Moreover, it is more cost-effective not only taking into account the use of de-zombified fighters and manpower, and reputational and political aspects, but more cost-effective even purely based on the cost of ammunition.
- Traditional ammunition has an efficiency of <1%. - 99% of energy and materials they waste.
Traditional ammunition kills n because they are simply not capable of neutralizing the enemy otherwise.
However, for the targeted delivery of micrograms of a paralyzing substance - in particular, a winged Micro-rocket requires an order of magnitude less energy and materials than are needed for a similar neutralization by causing physical injuries.
That is, the question is precisely in bringing the legal sphere into conformity.

21st century war doctrine:

The doctrine of modern, in the age of the Internet, war should not be mass murder, but the development of strategies to help enemy soldiers - help in the broadest sense:
- Assistance in maintaining mental health and dezombing ;
- Assistance in safe pseudo- " desertion" - to Europe before the "call", as well as through the "front line", especially since this is not available in the conditions of the use of billions of network Micro-missiles throughout the entire depth of the territory - using a variety of carriers, up to to space.
Representatives of the Government of Ukraine claim that half of the young Russian "zombies", however, do not want to die in order to kill Ukrainians.
On the 2nd side, there are at least a million human rights activists and lawyers who would agree to provide free legal assistance to Russians in order not to kill or die.
Russians may be indifferent to the tricks of their Rulers, they can put up with even an empty refrigerator, but the deaths of their loved ones are the most sensitive issue for them, around which they are ready to unite.
This area of work is so obvious that its absence suggests that the Government of Ukraine is simply interested in the deaths of Ukrainians too.

Purely pragmatically, a "terrorist" should receive a reward much greater than "his own" Micro-rocket operator, who in general should be an internationalist volunteer, "playing" remotely - just for an idea.
The "terrorist" should receive a reward greater than the money spent to kill him. -
Ukrainian scammers spending on defense = UAH 420 billion . / 42,000 dead Russians = 10 million UAH . payments to every Russian "kamikaze".
This calculation is oversimplified - it is given only to demonstrate the magnitude.
At the same time, there should be almost no human fighters on the "front line" - it is more cost-effective for the "fighters" to work on the development and production of the same Micro-rockets, their carriers, transport for "terrorists" and various space surveillance and communications equipment.

Cost accounting, piecework:

This system is optimal, most effective, including in the war of the 21st century.
However, the hierarchical "Russian World" of Ukraine is not adequate to this system.
only ensure coordination, unity and effective interaction - under the system of P 2 P - payments of 10 million hryvnias - for each immobilized terrorist of the Russian Federation.

" Konnor ". http : //dw2020.narod . _ _ en /

7650