Divine works


eng deu рус


Property Liberalization and Liberal Socialism:

The proposed liberalization of property is not liberal socialism.
Classical Liberal socialist John Stuart Mill, for example, proposed balancing private enterprises with worker cooperatives.
However , it is really possible to balance private enterprises with workers' cooperatives only with the help of the state, artificially.

"Democratic" communism is impossible:

Dictatorship, perhaps, is a necessary attribute of an "artificial" economic system - in the case of "socialist" "socialization", more precisely, the nationalization of all means of production.
That is, dictatorship is not an invention, not Lenin's mistake, but an inevitable, necessary way of existence of the communist mode of production.

The Institute for the Protection of Private Property arose - to protect against the state, which was then a monarchist.
Today, however, the protection of private property works to monopolize the means of production and to obtain, through this, superprofits.

Today it is more effective to protect private property by "reducing" the state itself.
Then she will not need protection, as in Russia, and it will be possible to liberalize her .

Liberalization of property offers only an increase in private competition - by reducing the monopoly "fixedness" of private property.
The decrease in the "fixedness" of private property lies in the development of the institution of ease of change of owners and users of the means of production.

The ease of changing owners and users is ensured not with the help of the power of the state, but with the help of the power of competitors-applicants and the digital intellectualization of law. - Today, for example, stocks can change hands cheaply 100 times a day.

Bankruptcy law instead of the institution of bankruptcy:

The right of ownership can be competitive - with the prohibition of the prohibition of claims for "foreign" property = with the prohibition of monopoly.
Bankruptcy law can be a development of the institution of bankruptcy with very weak criteria for retaining property.

Another similar institution that exists today is the institution of land ownership. - In many countries - if the owner damages landed property, or even simply misuses it, then a process can be launched that can end in the sale of this land.
The development of the institution of property liberalization is to simplify, automate, globalize and further reduce the cost of these processes.

The theory of monopolization of the means of production most adequately (and beautifully) describes the cause of economic inequality.
In addition, it is easier for propagandists-demagogues to arouse hatred both towards communists and vice versa, towards anti-communists, using "theories" on "props". Such contrived theories are both Marxism and not about - "liberalism" (=demagogic anti-liberalism).

" Konnor "

2461