Divine works


eng deu рус


You have to rely on yourself:

Against the government

Ukrainians are winning not thanks to Zelensky and the Government of Ukraine, but in spite of them, just as the Soviet people won in World War II - in spite of the Stalinist authorities.
Yes, one cannot compare Zelensky and Stalin, however, the system of power and administration in Ukraine has so far little departed from the Soviet one, from the "Russian world".
Every day, numerous acts of sabotage are uncovered in Ukraine, not necessarily with malicious intent, but the personal interests of officials still, as a rule, do not coincide with the interests of Ukrainians.
Ukrainians are winning not thanks to Zelensky, but thanks to Maidan, thanks to the freedom that they have achieved - themselves.
It is freedom, independence and initiative that defeat the Russian army, which is 10 times superior in military equipment.

In no case are we inciting against the Government of Ukraine. – Democracy in Ukraine is incomparable with the Russian Federation and continues to grow.
We only propose not to rely on the Government of Ukraine, but to do everything - without looking back at the Government - not to adapt to the laws, but to adjust the laws to full democracy, to continue to impose further democratization on the Government.
It is necessary to cooperate with the Government, but not in the sense of submission, but in the sense of imposing the will of the people on it.

The main task now is to develop this will, including the Russian people, cleansed of the influence of propaganda. "Deliberative democracy" is becoming more important - electoral.
This requires an appropriate - flat "Deliberative Network" of independent people.
Ordinary people will find a common language among themselves - both in the Donbass and in Transnistria. But for this they need an appropriate - their own tool.

See: Flat Counter-Propaganda. docx

Blackmailing Ukrainians does not work:

Ukrainians scare Europeans - "If Ukraine falls, then Russia will not stop and will reach Italy."
However, this is blackmail. - Everyone understands that Russia will not reach Italy.
Yes, the Putinites are no better than the Nazis, and "appeasement" does not work on them either.
It's just that Russia-2022 is incomparably weaker than Germany-1939.
For Italians, the nuclear threat from cornered Putinists is incomparably more dangerous than a simple military threat.
Yes, Europeans are selfish – they agree that Ukrainians die together with Ukraine for their peace of mind.
Therefore, Ukrainians should rely on themselves mainly, and not shift the solution of their own problems to the Europeans.
The EU introduced a half- embargo on oil and gas - and thanks for that.

What are Ukrainians dying for?

For oligarchs and traitors?
Where is the guarantee that the next Parashenko will not continue to cynically sell Ukraine under patriotic slogans?

The Administration of the President of Ukraine protects its own interests - the "Russian World" of Ukraine.
Therefore, one should only rely on oneself.

Cow:

It's a paradox - Ukraine wants to join the EU, but at the same time "Euro-commissioners" force Ukraine to implement EU rules. They drag her like a bull to a cow, and he rests.
This paradox is resolved elementarily:
The people of Ukraine want to join the EU,
And it is engaged in simulation, mimicry and cynical use of patriots against themselves - its rulers, starting with Poroshenko.
The rulers of Ukraine keep it in the " Russian world" - in fact, and only to maintain their power, given the mood of the people, they are forced to fight with the Russian Federation.
"Euro-commissioners", unlike naive Ukrainians, understand that democratic institutions in Ukraine do not yet work, and therefore communicate with those who own real power in it.

We believe that the most effective way to Europe is not to hope that a hero from the European Commission will do your job for you, and, moreover, not to rely on a "good" President, but to do everything yourself.
Jumping on the Maidan at the same time, shouting primitive slogans - is extremely ineffective - the bosses will fool you anyway, pretending to be ultra-people's patriots - this is their profession.
The most effective way is to do everything - with your own hands - with the help of an appropriate organization.
Moreover, such an organization until now was simply not possible - democratic inventions were just a utopia - until now - before the advent of high-speed Internet and intelligent IT capabilities.
cm.: Deliber Network Why Ukrainians need Deliber Network.docx

We offer:
1. Control power - to begin with - comprehensively and deeply. Not just demand. And do not rely on corrupt journalists.
2. By ourselves in parallel to build Ukraine. Do not wait for the European Commission to force the Ukrainian government to implement EU rules.

1. Simply demanding is not effective. Political technologists have long learned to meet any simple "anti-oligarchic" demands in such a way that the oligarchs will win - one way or another.
In order to control the power to the full extent, we need not just "civil society", NGOs - it is necessary to organize non-state directly public analytical, Deliberative structures.
2. We must not only demand - we must do it ourselves.
" Oboronprom " is not working effectively ?
- It is necessary to organize parallel, non-monopolistic " Oboronproms ".
Deliberative structures, among other things, should develop projects for effective organizations.

Why did Putin take power? - Thanks to the stupidity of the "democrats":

In 1990-91, the "democrats" in the USSR failed to create an effective political organization.
The "democrats" remained only talkers, and the power remained - with the former " partocrats " and the KGB , who mimicked the democrats, as they mimicked the communists before, and with the help of retaining power in their hands - successfully discredited democracy.

The EU is more pro-Ukrainian than the Ukrainian government:

Since their own "democrats" turned out to be completely untenable, now Western politicians have to do their work for them. - To impose the will of the people of their own country on the former " partocrats " and the KGB.
Of course, Western politicians are guided by their own interests, but in the face of the threat from the Putinists , these interests turn out to be largely consistent with the interests of the people of Ukraine.

Agreement with " partisanism ":

A unique situation of agreement with anarchism has now arisen in Ukraine.
European rulers make concessions not only to the Putinists , but, more importantly, they will "turn a blind eye" to the ultra-democratic processes in Ukraine.
The rulers of Ukraine will also agree to tolerate independent "partisans", just as the Chiang Kai- shek tolerated the Communists in China in 1938.

And the "partisans" can indeed be a decisive force.
- Democracy is not just a comfortable life like in Switzerland, but Democracy can be stronger than dictatorship - militarily.
But this potential has yet to be realized.
And for this, an organization is needed that is independent of the rulers of Ukraine dependent on Moscow.

The offensive of the Russian army on Kiev was repulsed - despite the sabotage of the command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, thanks to partisans like " Air Intelligence " and the initiative of the Armed Forces of Ukraine - from below.
That is, contrary to the suggestion of propaganda, " partisanism " is already more effective than the rigid command system of the Russian Federation.

We can't rely on the EU:

Nor can one hope that Ukraine's accession to the EU will make Ukrainians richer - automatically.
- And without Ukraine's accession to the EU, the EU removed import duties for it, increased import quotas, and give refugees the opportunity to work.
- All this is secondary. - The main thing is political reforms in Ukraine itself - eliminating the mechanisms of corruption, the independence of the authorities from the people and the dependence of the judicial system on the 1st.
And the EU will not do them instead of the Ukrainians, although it is trying to link Ukraine's accession to the EU with legal reforms.

Nonsense - the European Commission is trying to solve the problems of Ukrainians - for the Ukrainians.
Thanks to her, but without Ukrainians, the European Commission will not solve the problems of Ukrainians.
In addition, the 7 requirements of the European Commission to the Ukrainian authorities dated 06/17/22 are very superficial and formal general phrases. -
- In the "Russian World" they learned to easily bypass them.
These are the requirements:
1. "Integrity and professionalism"
2. " conscientiousness of candidates"
3. "Intensifying the fight"
4. "anti-money laundering"
5. "limit the influence of the oligarchs"
6. "combat the influence of vested interests"
7. "adopt effective arrangements"
All this is suitable for Europe, where it has been working for a long time, but this is not a reform program of the "Russian World".

True, the requirements of the European Commission are referred to the documents submitted to the "Venice Commission", by the way, not even considered by the latter yet - more specific, but still inadequate.

At the same time, there are enough analysts in the EU who could present:
1. Constructive, not negative requirements;
1. Requirements designed for interaction - with the subjects of the Civil Society in Ukraine.
The European Commission, having put forward 7 demands, acted quite wisely - the Zelensky Administration will now not be able to apply the traditional for the "Russian World" manipulation of extortion, profanation, hoaxes and substitution. - The element of Maidan will not allow saboteurs and agents of the Kremlin to do this.
However, focusing only on the elements, and not on reasonable interaction, is not optimal.
2. Requirements that would be removed - the systemic, underlying causes of the same corruption - in the "Russian World" - political monopoly, oligarchic propaganda, hierarchy, etc. - instead of the requirements for checking the "good faith and professional qualities" of a terrorist - by the same terrorists.

The fact is that the political system in the EU is not fundamentally different from that of the "Russian world".
Europe is just lucky. - Its political system was formed at a time when modern political technologies did not yet exist.
Today, the political system of the EU is already simply unstable.

Can't rely on rulers

It is necessary to leave the rulers of Ukraine to deal with the problem themselves - how to stay in the corrupt "Russian world", and at the same time show the people a "tick" about joining the EU.
We must rely on ourselves -
we must make Ukraine European - de facto, and not just de jure,
we must ourselves create the most effective today - Flat organizational and legal economic forms.
And you need to start - with defense IT .

Incubator-situation:

In Ukraine, a unique situation has now arisen, when the results of developments are paid not by their end users, but by various "sponsors".
This situation is favorable precisely for the emergence and development of a new organizational and legal economic form.

Nonsense - during the war, the need for workers increases sharply, at the same time, financial assistance to Ukraine increases by an order of magnitude ...
and at the same time, the number of vacancies decreases - by 20 times.
At the same time, IT specialists are among the most unnecessary, although objectively they are the most needed.
This is already sabotage, and not just the uselessness of the Government, unable to foresee and organize anything.
( Data of the personnel portal - Grc.ua)

1 day of delay = 200 deaths:

It is necessary to organize the receipt of sponsorship - directly, and not through intermediaries in the government of Ukraine.
And, most importantly, it is necessary to organize the most effective today - Flat structures for the development of weapons.
If near Kiev there were several killed Russians for 1 killed Ukrainian, then in the Donbass Ukrainians are already dying more than Russians.
One cannot hope that Zelensky will persuade the Germans in 2024 to give not 3 MLRS, but 3000. - After all, someone's sons, fathers die at the front every day.
- It is necessary to organize the most effective forms of resistance - immediately.

Independence is self-reliance:

Did the Americans put their howitzers without GPS guidance? Is it forbidden to use their weapons to eliminate terrorist assets on the territory of the Russian Federation? – The Americans are right – the risk of a global nuclear war does not pay off by saving thousands of Ukrainians.
Moreover, the Ukrainians are able to make the necessary improvements - on their own. And the unique situation in Ukraine today can make their developments more effective than even the Americans themselves.

What to do:

Ukrainians can live better than the Russians - if they do not wait for the Europeans to force their rulers to implement EU rules - the rulers in Ukraine are professionals, first of all, in simulation.
Ukrainians will be able to live better than the Russians - if they do not just demand that they be deceived, but engage in lawmaking - on their own - by creating an appropriate "Deliberative Structure" for this.
The optimal sector of the economy for the prosperity of Ukraine is not agriculture, not steel smelting, and not even the export of electricity, but the export of defense technologies. This is the result of the unique situation in Ukraine now:
1. The unique enthusiasm and patriotism of Ukrainians,
2. Lack of European social inertia. - Ukrainians can use more effective organizational and legal forms than in Europe now.

Competition with Kasyanov:

Competition with Kasyanov is essentially not competition, because it is not competition for profit. – The "enterprise" we propose is non-profitable .
The goal of Kasyanov's followers is not for money, but to defeat Putin's terrorists.
Cooperation with them on this platform is much stronger than competition.

Need for autonomy:

Today, the nature of competition between those in power is rapidly changing due to the rapid growth of IT , AI capabilities .
Today, the possibility of manipulating people is growing rapidly.
If always before the rulers were dependent on the people, competed with each other - for the support of the people - with the help of what gave their supporters real advantages over the supporters of competitors, today the rulers can create their own support and destroy the support of competitors - only through manipulation.
Today the rulers are becoming independent of the people. But with people they can do whatever they want.
The competition of those in power becomes "pure", and people become an unnecessary expendable material.
"Buryats" and "Ukrainians" will be pitted against each other, since no one needs them and only interferes. (Real Buryats and Ukrainians as an example are not yet suitable).
The rising standard of living is no need to raise already too. After all, suckers can always be convinced of the objectivity of processes.

From now on, there is only one possibility of solving everyday, and at the same time global issues - their independent solution - without rulers.
The same AI gives such an opportunity today.
Rulers don’t need people, but people don’t need rulers today - they cause only problems too.

More efficient - from scratch:

State administration in Ukraine works worse than in Russia. - Sabotage was added to corruption - in the same Oboronprom , in the SBU, in all government agencies.
to clean up and reform public administration , but this should not be the main strategy. - It is more effective to focus immediately on more effective forms of organization in the 21st century - "flat".

"Russians" are passive "homosexuals" to their liking:

Lack of initiative + diligence - the main features of the national character.

Example: Selection for free volunteer work:

“I wrote on Facebook that we need a volunteer, about 100 people came.
Our hr -volunteer interviewed all of them , selected the best.
And then I conducted repeated interviews and chose my assistant ...
[The boss called] ... shouted into the phone: who authorized you? ".
(www.theinsider.ua/lifestyle/professiya-volonter-vitalii-deinega-vernis-zhivym)
But when the boss = terrorist gives a command to a convinced pacifist to kill more people - he dies, but he kills.

1% of the budget and the state does not need:

"If I had a billion hryvnias, I would close all ATO issues. But I have only 5 million."
(ibid.)
Our hypothesis is that state scientific institutions are just as ineffective, or rather effective only for sabotage.

Flat Democracy as a sustainable form of Direct Democracy:

Swiss referendums on any occasion are not Direct Democracy.
The Swiss are perfectly manipulated by everyone - from native political technologists to Moscow propagandists.
In the 21st century, the Swiss form of Direct Democracy is unsustainable.
In the "Russian world", as well as in Switzerland , all terrorist attacks and non-freedom are legitimized by the consent of the majority.
The model of checks and balances of the branches of government that was successful in the 19th century no longer works in the 21st century. - Polit and other monopolists of the 21st century, who legislate their position, find effective IT ways to realize their interests within the framework of even the so-called Direct Democracy.

Since the 21st century, only 1 form of social organization that is resistant to degeneration is possible , and that is Flat Democracy.
Only the absence of concentration itself, the centralization of power, guarantees the survival of mankind in 300 years.
At the same time, only the same IT makes Flat Democracy possible.
However, there is a huge distance from potential possibility to realization.
The efforts of theorists and IT geeks-activists are needed,
An appropriate social-scientific organization is needed - also flat, non-hierarchical , directly social.

At the same time, the flat organization is simpler than the currently existing hybrid models of democracy. -
In a flat - true democracy, numerous complex institutions of power, necessary to legitimize the interests of monopolists, are simply not needed.
This does not mean that there is no need for so-called "professionals", who are now only professionals in deception.
It's just that specialists will not be intermediaries who make their own decisions.
- "Servants of the people" in Ukraine are not such. "Servants of the people" can only be specialists who are 100% dependent only directly on people, like private hired lawyers.

Flat democracy is at the same time:

This is liberalism.
- This is complete liberalism - this is a flat "division" of production conditions, etc. It's the lack of exclusivity.

This is socialism
- This is a decrease in social polarization not due to taxes, but due to the liberalization of property.
This is Effective Altruism.

This is "nationalism".
- The people of this nation, that is, those living in this country, are most beneficial - Flat democracy.
Inclusive relationships will reduce added value and close the gap between the global North and South. Migrants themselves will not want to go to Europe.

This is independence:
- These are not just freedoms and human rights, this is independence - of people from the rulers, and not the independence of some petty tyrants () in Kyiv) from others (in Moscow).

See: Flat Democracy Manifesto.docx

Glory to Ukraine!

However, we are patriots not so much of Ukraine as of "divine".
The independence of the state of Ukraine and nations in general is a necessary but not sufficient condition for the survival of freedom.
We are opponents of statehood as such - as an unstable phenomenon.
We are indifferent to the state of Ukraine. - In this situation, the Government of Ukraine is interested in an alliance with the "partisans" and it is not profitable for it to interfere with Flat structures.

Anarchism and Ukraine:

Ukraine is therefore suitable for Flat Democracy, because it has never had statehood. -
The ideas of freedom have always prevailed over the idea of the Ukrainian Empire.
However, already in the 1990s, Great Ukrainian sentiments appeared in Ukrainian nationalism.
And today, many Ukrainians are fighting not for freedom, but to return what supposedly belongs to them - Crimea Donbass.
Although, when they conquer Crimea, Crimea will belong to the rulers of Ukraine, and not to those who won it at the cost of their blood.

Project: Donetsk Autonomy:

The main reason for the success of the separatists in Donbass is not the military force of the Russian Federation and not even the Putinists’ propaganda , but disappointment in Ukraine.
The reason is the failure of the Democratic Ukraine Project.
Instead, a corrupt oligarchy was built .
The miners played one of the main roles in the collapse of the USSR and in the creation of an independent Ukraine.
But they were deceived in their hopes by pseudo- " shit -crats " who sold the idea of democracy to " grabbers " for money.

It's not about nostalgia. - In many aspects, the quality of life in Donetsk in 1990 was superior to 2014.
The cultural difference between Western Ukraine and Donbass really exists.
- There is no national idea of Ukraine in Donbass.

Another question is that the Putinites are cynically and vilely exploiting the disappointment and non-nationalism of the Donetsk people .
And the Putinists will not return the Soviet 1990s. - The dictatorship of the Russian Federation is similar to the dictatorship of the CPSU only externally, but in fact it is already an olicharchy too, only the rulers do not hire rulers, but the rulers hire oligarchs .

The conquest of Donbass and Crimea by purely military force will cost many deaths - including Ukrainians.
We offer the Project: Donetsk autonomy.
- Autonomy - in alliance with a democratic European Ukraine, and not with a dictatorial Russian Federation.
- Autonomy - deeper than the autonomy of the US states that have their own laws.

But Autonomy should begin not with territorial autonomy, but with virtual implementation, detailing one's own idea.
Moreover, the Donetsk idea of autonomy has 100-year historical roots. - It was in the Donbass that the most successful movement of autonomists in Europe existed at that time - with its center in Gulyai-Pole.
The meaning of the word " Autonomism " here is not in autonomy from Ukraine, although this is also necessary, but in social autonomy from the state as such.

The liberation of Donbass should begin not with a military special operation, but with a proposal, or rather, with the construction of an alternative to the "Russian world", including oligarchic Ukraine - in western or southern Ukraine.
The USA defeated the USSR - an example of a better life for people. Soviet propaganda did not save then. It is possible to defeat the Russian Federation - only by example too.
A better life than in the Russian Federation can be achieved - with an effective political system and if defense becomes the main branch of the economy.

AIDS = Ukraine:

What is AIDS?
This is a virus infection of the anti-virus system.
Similarly, the SBU (Security Service of Ukraine) was initially controlled by Moscow.
Even now, the SBU is preventing the Christians of Ukraine from leaving the power of the Moscow Patriarchate.
The USSR was famous for its network of agents - every 3rd "responsible" employee was an informer or agent of the KGB.
In 1991, the intelligence network in Ukraine was inherited by the FSB.

Ukraine is a country of saboteurs. -
- In Ukraine, people have become “ embarrassed ” and since 2014 they have ceased to obey orders from Moscow.
However, Moscow continued to control the leadership of Ukraine.
For example, partisans had to go to the front in the Donbass - in the trunk, in order to die secretly from the leadership in Kyiv.
Unfortunately for Moscow, gradually it began to lose power over the leadership in Kiev .
Therefore, the Putinists decided to restore order - to purge Kiev.
And since they still controlled power in Kyiv, they hoped to bring their troops into Kyiv in 3 days.
True, they underestimated the "saboteurs " - partisans.

Our idea, which we have been offering to the “partisans” since 2014, was not to try to do our own purge, to lustrate the authorities in Kiev, but first to organize ourselves, in parallel.
Firstly, the atomized Ukrainians would not have had enough intelligence to understand the institutions of power - they were only able to jump and protest on the Maidan.
Secondly, Building from scratch in this case was easier than rebuilding.
And one does not interfere with the other.
For example, the OUN cooperates well with the same SBU. True, the centralized leadership of the OUN was partially controlled by the FSB too.
(By the way, the FSB provoked the creation of the Nazi "Svoboda" in Ukraine - in order to accuse Ukrainians of Nazism, and proposed the name "Svoboda" - in order to compromise liberalism at the same time).
I say this to the fact that you have to rely on yourself, and not on the SBU or the President.

Start - with the "Deliberative Network":

And it was necessary to start - with the creation of a parallel scientific organization - with the "Deliberative Network".
- Precisely and only a scientific organization would be capable of self-cleansing from KGB agents.
(By the way, I proposed the "Deliberative Structure" 3 times back in 1990, by the way - from Ukraine. I came to Ukraine in 1987 - Ukraine was a key link for the restructuring of the USSR).
If in 2014 the Ukrainians organized themselves and made a counter purge of power, then in 2022 there would be no war, and they would not have to lose sons, fathers and husbands.

Ukraine is still in the "Russian world" :

Today, military, industrial, etc. organization in Ukraine, still from the inefficient "Russian World".
War forces you to speed up. – To elect Zelensky and calm down, hoping that the Office of the President will become its own enemy, means betraying your loved ones. -
For 8 years, the Ukrainians themselves have been forced to collect money for " broniki " and for anything for the soldiers, while " UkrObronProm " actually worked for Putin.
(www.facebook.com/p.vernivskiy
https://t.me/SBUkr
w ww.unian.net/war/voyna-s-rossiey-stali-izvestny-imena-predateley-sredi-rukovodstva-ukroboronproma-novosti-vtorzheniya-rossii-na-ukrainu-11751283.html
"The Russian Federation is attacking Ukraine with missiles that it received from it in the 1990s":
www.nytimes.com/2022/12/12/world/europe/russia-ukraine-missiles.html)
"Sold out defense enterprises":
www.unian.net/war/voyna-v-ukraine-2022-v-snbo-rasskazali-kak-glava-minoborony-belarusi-obmanul-ukraincev-novosti-vtorzheniya-rossii-na-ukrainu-11849064.html
"The leadership of the Antonov State Enterprise caused damage to the enterprise for 1 billion UAH ":
www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1404033756751560
"Hell for innovators . Why Ukraine will not have its own Elon Musk":
https://focus.ua/opinions/475798-ad-dlya-innovatorov-pochemu-v-ukraine-ne-budet-svoego-maska
But we propose not to replace the SBU, but continue to only improve the security of our men.

Military-industrial complex of Ukraine:

More optimally - not to buy weapons in the West, but to develop our own defense industry.
The non-priority development of the defense industry is sabotage and wrecking by the Kremlin agents in the Government of Ukraine.
Indeed, it makes sense:
1, Temporarily transfer Ukrainian defense enterprises to neighboring friendly EU countries - for security purposes.
2. Creation of joint defense enterprises of Ukraine with the EU countries.
3. Localization of the production of the latest Western weapons that it uses.
There are restrictions on the use of Western weapons on the territory of Russia.
Everyone "saw numerous shots of the burnt rashist equipment from the Stugna and the results of the work of the Neptune . r results of the MLRS "Alder", " Bureviy ", "Verba" and others.
After the victory, the demand for Ukrainian weapons will grow.
Ukraine should become a global player in the modern arms market and be seen not as a beggar for arms, but as a promising partner."

Objections:

The Ukrainian government has already dramatically increased military production.
He simply has little money to increase it even more - does the Russian Federation with its raw material income still have the opportunity to outstrip Ukraine in military investment?
Military production for export:
1. Do not increase quickly - due to high competition, even taking into account the combat tests of the produced weapons.
2. It will "feed" only itself. - It will not be able to "donate" weapons for the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

However:
1. It is possible to ensure that a very large amount of Western aid is in financial form, and not in kind.
- Spend the money received from the West - on their own production of weapons.
Then you can get more than 2 times more of these weapons than if they were supplied "in kind".
2. The main factor in the "consumer value" of weapons today is intellectual.
"Intellectual capital" can be basically - free of charge - given:
2.1. The motivation of Ukrainians and many ordinary people in the West.
2.2. IT -opportunities for collective research and development.
2.3. Free weapon test - "partisans".

"Ukrainian startup network ":

Zelensky - the head of the "Russian World" of Ukraine - is an ally, but, nevertheless, also in fact an enemy of the Ukrainians.
In Ukraine, a lot of IT people and online workers have divorced - because of the monopoly and corruption - the "Russian World" of Ukraine.
The rulers of Ukraine created conditions in Ukraine in which Ukrainians were forced to look for work online , emigrate, and go to the "Maidan".
But even after the "Maidan" the political system of Ukraine has changed little.
And now the political monopolists of Ukraine want to use people who themselves were forced to look for work online , coming up with various state programs for the exploitation of "Ukrainian oil" and "cutting", including through taxes - investments with the help of the "Ukrainian Startup Fund ".
Yes, the "Ukrainian Startup Fund ", more precisely, an organization that helps create startups but does not concentrate finance, helping to receive investments - P 2 P - directly from Western citizens - such an organization would be very useful for Ukrainians who are forced to outsource one by one for cheap be sold to Western and Russian firms.
But such an organization should be an NGO, independent of the state.
For its organization, among other things, I proposed in 1990 the "Deliberative Structure".

See :

Women's KB. < a href="Женское%20КБ.docx">docx
P2P investments are more effective than public ones:

It is more efficient to engage not in collecting money from neighbors for socks to soldiers, but in organizing parallel financing.
Only the United States gave the Government of Ukraine $30 billion -. from American taxpayers.
If you organize P 2 P -help directly from the US population and business, then you can attract even more than $ 30 billion.

Zelensky has been "knocking out" tanks from the West for a year now. But tanks are almost useless, completely sub-optimal.
American help can be used much more effectively.
It's not that there are incompetent fools in the Government . – The very hierarchical organization of the Government is ineffective today.
In order to find the best solutions, I proposed to self-organize the "Deliberative Network".
Why not try? - it will not be worse. But there will be another chance to save the life of your family.

NGOs helping Ukrainians:

They predict a reduction in military supplies from the United States after September 2023. And if Trump or the like becomes the president of the United States again in 2024, then supplies may stop altogether.
The meaning of liberalism is to ignore the US government, and, at the same time, Ukraine and organize military assistance to Ukrainians - directly.
In any case, it is necessary to immediately create an NGO for large-scale military assistance to Ukrainians and Free Russia.
It is necessary to create appropriate legitimate social institutions that expand and decentralize democracy in the United States, since the subject is still weapons, although this is not a private trade in weapons for profit.

Ukrainian-Jewish Friendship Society:

It is beneficial for Jews to create an NGO (Non-Governmental Organization) jointly developed with Ukrainians:
1. The Israelis, as well as the Ukrainians, are opposed by non-friends that are many times larger in population.
2. Ukraine is the world's best testing ground for the use of the most modern types of weapons.
3. The Kremlin is deeply and secretly military-technologically cooperating with Iran and anti-Zionist organizations in the Middle East too.
4. A large proportion of the population of Israel are immigrants from Ukraine, and in recent aliyah .
5. It is beneficial for the Jews to maintain economic ties in Eastern Europe, and Ukraine will be the best springboard for this.
6. The Government of Israel also tends to move towards the authoritarian "Russian World".
Instead of Mozambique-style jumping in the street against Netanyahu, it is much more effective to "direct action" - organizing "flat" self-government - instead of the Government of Israel, too.

The government of Israel does not benefit from official assistance to Ukraine.
The government of Ukraine is still in the "Russian world" and will not cooperate effectively either.
- You have to rely on yourself.
Although secret cooperation with the Government is possible a la Wagner PMC.
For example, the Mossad service has sufficient funds to eliminate the main terrorist of the planet. The latter will be a strong factor in ending the Russian-Ukrainian war. The latter, and the penultimate one, corresponds to the interests of the governments of "democratic" countries.

"Strategists" = pests:

The more strategic , the general question, the more expensive the error in solving it.
Moreover, his solution should be optimal.
The more people should participate in its discussion.
On one condition - the presence of an effective system of collective discussion.

"Strategi" - the heads of all departments of Ukraine, including the President = wreckers - today not because they are agents of the FSB, although there is a significant proportion of agents among them. But because they are competitors to more efficient forms of organization.
And these competitors have their own interests and their own "levers" of influence on people, including propaganda
That is, they belong to the Russian world, not necessarily - Russia, but - Ukraine.

Extra link:

The function of the chief is "responsibility" for the state of some direction.
The boss secures this state through the development of investments.
For example, the boss considers commercial proposals from firms that offer increasingly sophisticated tools to ensure the desired state.
Listens to advertisements, buys a tool, and instructs his subordinates to use the tool.
Even if the seller did not bribe the boss, when using the tool, subordinate users will immediately find many shortcomings in it.
"The devil is in the details", which even a "competent" boss cannot penetrate and predict.
The service agreement was drawn up by a subordinate lawyer, whose interests do not at all coincide with the interests of subordinates using the tool.

The concentration of "responsibility" occurs only because there is a concentration of power.
The concentration of power, on the other hand, has only historical reasons.
Modern information technologies make it possible to provide the necessary conditions more effectively - with the help of only horizontal interaction - without the authorities - an extra link.

You have to rely on yourself:

"Maidan" gave Ukrainian women not only freedom, which in itself can not buy anything, but also opportunities.
We propose not to rely on the Government of Ukraine, but to do everything ourselves.
( Ukraine is still in the "Russian world" )

We can say that we offer to help the Government, but to help without asking permission, because this way is more effective both for your loved ones and for Ukraine.
If we consider that the Motherland is people, and not the Office of the President.

Front line protection

 

"Authoritarian Democracy":

Perhaps the most competitive will be a hybrid form:
1. 100% democratic = free, decentralized coordinating global network, including generating business ideas , and
2. "Authoritarian" business start-ups that implement business plans.
- The threat to Humanity is not "petty bourgeois", but - state forms.

Hey patriots?

We respect the patriots of Ukraine very much and want to cooperate with them, and not use them, as the Ukrainian authorities do.
We believe that Ukraine is still in the "Russian world".
The essence of the "Russian world" is in corruption, etc., and not in the language.
The persecution of the Russian language and culture is a scam and sabotage too.
Separation of Ukrainian culture from Russian is also a policy of division in order to dominate.
Ordinary people do not need conflict. People are more interested in tolerance than rulers.

Putin, by the way, is the first enemy of the Russian, not so much because he blew up houses in Moscow.
An example of a traitor using patriots is Poroshenko. - He is cynical under patriotic slogans, in particular . undermined the security of Ukraine in the oil and gas sector
"Poroshenko is suspected of having contributed to the activities of the L/DNR terrorist organizations"
(Fedotov, Sorochko , Egorova - examples of judges-saboteurs, henchmen of the President).

We are looking for patriots of Ukraine, not those who want to give their lives for the traitors of Ukraine, but those who want to build an internally Free Ukraine, and not a dictatorial antipode of the Russian Federation.
So far, we see that there are many Useful Idiots in Ukraine, but there are no patriots in it, because a true patriot will not hope that Poroshenko and Zelensky will build a Free Ukraine instead of him, but will build it personally, regardless of the latter .
And since even the project of a Free Ukraine is already very complicated, it is necessary to start with the creation of a directly public social and scientific structure.
The "explanations" of the authorities about the need for "professionalism" are also a scam . We will not repeat here about "professionalism". – See our articles.
We do not want to offend Zelensky's fans, but only say that relying on him is unacceptable.

Silencing:

For several decades, we have been unsuccessfully trying to find like-minded people for cooperation, including for the creation of the aforementioned public structure.
In particular, we are banned in social networks and in all forums - both Ukrainian and Western.
The impression is that the moderators of the most " Bandera " resources are FSB agents.
To hundreds of e - mails , no one answered us in essence.
" Lichka " in social networks for most activists is disabled from correspondence with strangers.
Please advise how we can find Ukrainian patriots. Or is there really none out of 40 million ?

The "argument" that during the war there is no time for theories - there is a scam too:
Firstly, there was no time before the war,
Secondly, one does not interfere with the other, but on the contrary, for example, the proposed Structure is the best defense tool too.

About myself, by the way:
Unfortunately, I do not feel patriotism towards the state of "Kazakhstan", but only disgust.
For me, Ukraine and Kazakhstan are random historical phenomena.
However, Ukraine is at the same time a unique historical confluence of circumstances. – Paradoxically, but more than in Sweden, in Ukraine, the emergence of effective anarchist organizations is now possible – Circumstances are more weighty than opportunities.

" Connor ". http : //dw2020.narod . _ _ en

28413

 

Women's KB :

(Women's Design Bureau)

It is not true that technology is not a woman's business.

Mothers and wives in Ukraine, unlike "Russian mothers" (see www.svoboda.org/a/rodina-macheha-sergey-medvedev-k-mifu-o-russkoy-zhenschine-/32292150.html), want to keep the lives of their sons and betrothed.
At the same time, feminists are right - women in Ukraine can now do more than men. -
Men are bound by military regulations, they have old weapons.
In the digital technological age, a female developer can eliminate more notional terrorists, and thus save more lives of Ukrainians, including those close to her, than her husband on the battlefield.

The idea is simple:

1. The intellectual and engineering factor is of decisive importance today.
A little engineering optimization can give a decisive advantage on the battlefield.

2. Up to 90% of labor hours in the creation of weapons falls precisely on intellectual and engineering work - today.
- Computer simulation replaces up to 90% of the hardware research and testing that took place in the 20th century.
On the 2nd side, computer modeling makes it possible to achieve a much higher degree of optimality of the chosen design solution.
Thus, the factorial weight of finding the most constructive solution increases.
And with the choice of decisions, people are still doing better.
But in this they can already help significantly - DAI /
And most importantly, the optimality of the solution found strongly depends on the organization of the discussion of possible options. That is, it strongly depends on the structure of the Deliberative structure.

The housekeeper is stronger than the commando:

A housekeeper can take out more terrorists than a fighter in a trench today.
Not with bare hands, of course. A person is generally strong not with fangs.
All intellectual and engineering work can be remote - today.
Including >50% of the work at the landfill - this is the input of parameters and the processing of the results can be remote too.
They can be remote too.

The only thing left is organization. -
You can take as a basis - some online freelance system :

Differences from freelancing and traditional KB:

Volunteering, "Gift Economy":

- No tasks;
- No paid contracts;
- No job responsibilities.

There are voluntary commitments to do something that only affect the Member's Rating .
Participant:
- Or silently does the work that he considers necessary,
- Or silently does the work, the need for which has been developed in the "Network".
- Or discusses the work, the need for which has been developed in the "Network" - with the participants in its discussion.
As a rule, "performers" and "customers" are the same people - from the same circle of developers.

There are also voluntary P 2 P donations.

 

Non-formality:

If for freelance performers - the work is formalized - for monetary chargeability .
Here it is not.
- "Contractor" is not a performer, but is an initiative co-developer.

Involvement:

Full equality of participants.
No work restrictions. Lack of "exclusivity".
Everyone does what he sees fit.
That is, everyone can offer strategic solutions.
Another thing is that Deliberative procedures are also being developed, which:
- Focused only on finding - optimal solutions,
- Ratings are taken into account - last but not least - when it is difficult to objectively assess the effectiveness of the proposed solution.
- Designed for the participation of a large number of people.
For this, DAI ( Distributed AI) is used.

Secret paradox:

1 problem remains - secrecy.
But the disadvantage of hierarchical organization is that it makes poor use of large amounts of decentralized grassroots information.
Discussions don't need to be kept secret .
The boss will give an order to the analyst to analyze the discussions.
The Contractor will make a Report in which he lists useful, in his opinion, ideas.
The boss will give an order - to the expert to make an expert opinion on the identified ideas.
However, the lack of hierarchy in front of the " flat " organization lies in the fact that for the boss himself, an expert opinion is what beads are for a pig.
He needs it only to pseudo-competently write a report already for a superior.
To get the most out of ideas, exactly what is needed is a flat Deliberative Structure using DAI .

to secret only - the calculations themselves.
It is optimal, probably, that the calculation remains with the one who made it.
He reports only conclusions and results to the Deliberative Structure.

Paradoxically, specialized secret services do more harm than good.
Whatever Stalinist repressions the United States used, there will still be

Information control is one of the main foundations of hierarchical organization.
- Its attribute (an integral property).

And to control information, it is necessary to use the performers of subordinates.
And the higher the level of secrecy of the topic, the higher the boss dealing with this topic, the more people work under him.

Among them there will always be Jack Teixeira .
- People are too complex to be 100% reliable .

For example, Americans receive information from almost every Russian intelligence agency.
www.bbc.com/russian/features-65169296

"Connor"

Letter to National squads Ukraine:

Hello.
I am looking for contacts with activists - supporters of replacing the police with non-state militia.
I would be grateful if you could forward my letter in such a way that they can contact me.
In 1988-92 I participated in the democratic movements in Ukraine.
Unfortunately, I did not find a detailed statement of the political position and program on the site https://ndrugua.org.
How close are your contacts with :
- Russian organizations? For example, with the "People's Self-Defense".
- Human rights organizations? After all, ensuring physical security should be the same as its legal support?
Who is investigating the connections of civil servants and politicians in Ukraine with the special services of the Russian Federation? - There is a widespread opinion about the activities of agents in Ukraine as the main reason for the failure of its socio-economic and democratic development.
Do you ensure the safety of civil society activists, investigators and observers? What?
Who develops social mechanisms for rapid response?
Is it true that your members beat the activists of European Solidarity?

Sincerely , Edil
17.10.2020