Divine works


eng deu рус


Deliberative network. - What is it and why is it needed:

The main threat to the existence of mankind:

The main threat to the existence of mankind comes from the concentration of power and money in the society of the near future.
Man is unstable by nature.
With the "singular" growth of AI's ability to manipulate people, there are bound to be people who will abuse this ability if they have even a small amount of power.
Authoritarian power is disastrous - 100%.
But the stability of even modern liberal-democratic systems is only 50/50.

Even if we exaggerate the threat:

Suppose the risk of degeneration and destruction of Civilization due to intellectual polarization is not 50%, but only 1.5%.
But if the reaction to the risk should be adequate to it, then even in the case of a 1.5% risk , an adequate measure would be, in particular, the creation of a super-democracy - in a country that makes up 1.5% of humanity, for example, in Russia.

The deliberative network is the organization of the Flat Social Science:

The science of society must be directly social.
see: P2P-Science Deliberative Network.docx
Existing social science is completely ineffective.
It would not matter if the survival of mankind did not depend on it - before anything else.

A small example of the inadequacy of existing social science. -
The taboo on racism interferes with modeling the growth of intellectual polarization due to the use of AI .
At the same time, other mechanisms for preventing the development of racist pseudoscience are possible. For example - "Censorship from below".
In general, the harm from racism today is incomparably less than the threat of " quasi -human racism."

The only chance of survival:

Humankind's only chance of survival is to create communities where there is no concentration of power and money.
The main function of hierarchical authority is the development of valuable instructions for executors.
However, today horizontal systems are becoming at the same time more efficient than hierarchical ones - thanks to the development of the same IT.
The deliberative network is a system of competitive development of social decisions that uses all the possibilities of IT.

IT factor:

IT allows:
1. Efficiently and cheaply collect all the necessary information.
Previously, only the authorities could afford to collect information with the help of the relevant services.
2. Deliberative effectively and cheaply - to millions of people.
Previously, only the authorities could afford to maintain a headquarters or a group of vassals to make optimal decisions.

However, a deliberative of a large number of people still needs to be highly structured .
But this structure not only can be - flat, but a flat structure is also more efficient - with the appropriate Software - precisely because of the growth of competitiveness and competitiveness .

Hierarchy Advantage Fake :

The sphere where the hierarchical system has a clear advantage is the sphere of massacres (military).
However, this is an error. -
In modern conditions, the decentralized Ukrainian army has shown a clear advantage over the rigidly hierarchical Russian one, in which the executors do not show initiative and wait for orders to arrive in a rapidly changing environment, and a significant increase in military specialties and relevant units only leads to hopeless inconsistency and departmentalism.

Moscow has managed to create a dead-end hierarchical structure even in science.
And it is in the social sciences that the Deliberative Network should show its first effective application.

Parliamentarism is unstable too:

Parliamentarians and "legislators" should not be involved in lawmaking at all. -
Even the parliamentary institution, not to mention the presidential one, is too high a manipulated concentration of power. Accordingly - unstable.
Only a flat deliberative structure should be engaged in lawmaking.

For example, in Ukraine, a lot of web "Boards" appeared in connection with the war.
However, they are extremely ineffective - a person, in order to find something of his own, needs to read a bunch of unnecessary things for him.
You need a specialized search engine. However, no one develops the terms of reference for it - because of the monopoly on the development of terms of reference .
New Search Engines, if they appear, are not in the bowels of corporations, but thanks to the efforts of brilliant singles and their random guessing of optimal niches.
However, in order to find optimal solutions, at the same time more and more technologically complex, it is precisely an adequate complex social structure that is required.

Why does Ukraine need a Deliberative Network?

- To get her out of the "Russian World".
Maidan took away power from the Kremlin agents legally, but not in fact.
The activists simply did not know what to do next.
And it's really not easy. “There are no simple measures.
By the way, the main reason why Ukraine is not accepted by the EU is because it is located in the "Russian World" - in fact.
That is, the Ukrainians want, but they can't, they don't know how.
This is exactly what the Deliberative Network is for - as an extra-state, extra-sabotage scientific structure of the people themselves. Flat, but "professional".
Today there is no time to wait - when the state democratizes itself or under pressure from the US or the EU. - Today, political technologies are much more developed than in the 19th century, and without active creation, the state is more likely to remain in the "Russian world", only even more sophisticated.

President Zelensky, by the way, is not a hero, but the head of saboteurs.
Possibly unintentional.
Ministers are far from being the fools they are portrayed as. – It’s just that their interests are not at all those that are published officially.
Nevertheless, the Ukrainian state can and should be an ally.
In this "anarchic" Ukrainian situation, Ukrainian ministers can understand what is more profitable for them to do - effective liberal-democratic reforms.
But for this it is necessary to create a structure that will do all their work - in parallel.
Doing it simply instead of the state will not work. But it will turn out - to dictate to the state.
However, this requires a structure that develops "professional" solutions.

"Crowdfunding":

Gigantic money is collected from ordinary people in the world to help the Ukrainian army.
We just need to self-organize in such a way that this money is collected not for the Ukrainian state, but for the independent "Azov" army, mainly for independent technological development. And they were going to - maximum P2P.
By the way, the Kremlin destroys "Azov" not for Nazism, but for autonomy.

The main harm of the "Minsk agreements", or the success of the Kyiv saboteurs is in the "disarmament of illegal groups."
The Deliberative network is needed, in particular, to find the legal forms of autonomous military formations, for example, based on the Swiss territorial forms.
Is it necessary that Elena Belozerskaya please Putin and go to the front line in the trunk?

"Effective altruism" is needed only at the beginning. Then you need to launch - an autonomous economy.
Ukraine is not accepted into the EU due to corruption, etc. legislation in particular.
A Deliberative network is needed - to find legal forms of non-corruption, etc. legislation, legislation that ensures the Ukrainian economic miracle.
Must not hope for numerous but pro-state scientific institutions in Ukraine.

"Russian World" was well figuratively described by Yuri Kasyanov

- Head of the independent design and production bureau "Technology Matrix":
"We have the monster Ukroboronprom, which slows down the development of defense technologies...
This is pure corruption...
Nobody wants to put on the balance these devices for the reason that if you suddenly lose the device, you will be dragged to the prosecutor's offices.
The army, on the other hand, uses drones - created by volunteers or other non-state groups.
It's just that the commander is responsible to the people who loaned the money, it's all based on normal human decent relations.
People are listed as grenade launchers, signalers, but in fact they are engaged in unmanned reconnaissance."

The deliberative network is organized self-employment:

If ordinary employers, with the help of general monopoly conditions in the state, concentrate for themselves specific monopoly conditions of production and hire, for example, programmers as executors, then the Deliberative Network is a non-state non-monopoly organization.

If a decentralized structure is superior even on the battlefield, then it must be superior to a hierarchical one in military technological science as well.
In Ukraine, thousands of vacancies for volunteers are published on the same web " Boards ".
However, they are all related to the performance of someone's tasks. There is not a single "Chief Wanted" ad.
At the same time, it is the work of the leaders that is extremely ineffective, if not a failure, despite all the victories of Ukraine. - It's just that in the army of the Russian Federation the situation is even worse.
At the same time, we are talking about the lives of people, and not just about the effectiveness of massacres.

 

Deliberative Network - Growth Issues:

Idea development factors:

1. The idea must be - strong. - Brad will not find supporters.
2. The idea should be well stated:
The speaker or writer must state the idea clearly, clearly, simply, convincingly.
It is about the idea, not the developed concept, ready for use.
Although the most popular ideas were not initially raw. That is, there was a conditional Darwin, who initially accompanied his idea with a good evidence base. That is, initially it was no longer just a hypothesis, but a well-developed concept.
3. The idea should be seen by the maximum number of potential supporters. For example, in relevant social networks.

The idea of the Deliberative Network itself is that modern IT can greatly help in growing, even "raw", undeveloped ideas - if they have "rational grains" - so that such ideas do not "fade out" at the very beginning.
The idea of the Deliberative Network is that modern IT can help - in finding potential supporters who will collectively work on the idea.

Deliberative Network = Civil Society

Vicious circle:

Ukrainians in the EU want the political-economic system, laws in Ukraine to become like in a rich, non-corrupt EU.
But Ukraine is not accepted into the EU, because - first, the political and economic system in Ukraine must become like in the EU.
Right now, Ukraine is in fact still in the “Russian world”.
Ukrainians are only mentally free in Europe.
The leadership of Ukraine is full of Kremlin saboteurs. Thanks to their successful work for 8 years, Polish guest workers did not start traveling to Ukraine, although in 1990 Ukraine was richer than Poland.
The Putinites started the War not because they wanted to seize the leadership of Ukraine, but because, on the contrary, they began to lose it.

Problem Solving - Deliberative Network:

We must begin with the development of a European Civil Society in Ukraine, only much more developed than in Europe.
- We need a network that is more organized, united, and not disparate NGOs, we need a network that controls, analyzing all the “crevices” of politics and economics. Need - Civil government, controlling all official structures.

Why not just civil society to take power?
Because it's not real.
- The process can only be - evolutionary, with the gradual replacement of structures with more democratic ones - exactly there. Where possible, while maintaining the efficiency of the state at every moment.

Competition using IT:

The weakness of personal autocracy is that it is personal.
It is optimal to direct the main blow to its weak link, to put up against the 1st moron - only a hundred, but organized intellectuals.
Breaking up the "system" is more difficult, because it is more united than a heterogeneous opposition that cannot agree within itself.

Informed choice:

This is another tool for the stability of civilization and a remedy against AI -manipulation of people in the context of the overwhelming intellectual superiority of AI over people.
The idea is to develop protocols and mechanisms for informed voting. -
The vote, the choice of a person is considered valid only if the person who voted meets the criteria of awareness.

However, the institution of Informed Choice itself can be a source of instability and manipulation, since it is similar to the institution of property, racial or intellectual qualifications.
Therefore, the institution of Informed Choice should have appropriate mechanisms to prevent its abuse.
First of all, these should be mechanisms:
1. Counteractions to mental and other manipulations,
2. Comprehensive, permanent, in-depth information, i.e. counter-propaganda.

The fundamental difference between the institution of Informed Choice is its focus not on discrimination, but on changing the status. -
If it is difficult to give property to the poor, or to repaint blacks into whites, then it is quite realistic to give an objective understanding to the fooled "Russians".

Analog use case:

Mechanisms of informed consent in medicine.

 

8031

 

§ Topics of the Deliberative Network:

The main scientific theme of the Deliberative Network is the survival of Civilization.
The rest of the topics are derived in the topic hierarchy:
- Self-organization of the Deliberative network
- Federation of independent Micro-Communities - organization, law, etc.;
- "Arks of freedom";
- Migration.
-- Guest Communities
- Effective altruism
- Non-violence, self-defense, elimination of crime, police and military forces.
- Climate and ecology.
- Energy
- Transport

§ Guest Communities :

For example, the founder of CouchSurfing - Casey Fenton seduced money and actually betrayed like-minded people. And the latter did not have the mind to create a reliable alternative.
Hospitality Club completely collapsed despite the fact that the demand for Guest Community Services has not only been preserved, but is increasing.

Stupid even Germans uselessly jump with posters in the squares, only amusing the powers that be, who, as in Russia, fool them with violent, but also useless activities.
We offer an alternative to protests - an alternative scientific organization for developing a policy of direct action, for example, in the form of the development of the Federation of Alternative Independent Autonomous Full - including the economic sphere - communities.

Freedom Factor:
We alone have developed more effective proposals on the above problems than all the centralized "Think Tanks" put together.