Divine works


eng deu рус


P2P culture:

Culture of the "Russian World":

Its differences:
Arrogance, interlocutors do not consider the feelings of others.
Aggressiveness. Relations above-below, "showdown" - who is smarter.

Provocation:

The culture of the "Russian World" is cultivated by the FSB trolls on the forums of the "Russian World", although this phenomenon is more complicated - it also supports itself.
Forums of the "Russian World" differ from European ones in the abundance of full-time trolls provocateurs, extinguishing any constructive and doubts - personal insults accompanying propaganda stupidity with phrases like - "a no brainer, but not for you", "you are a clown" go make people laugh with your nonsense in another place.
The forums of the "Russian World" are distinguished in particular by violent, unbridled fights of completely unfamiliar people hiding under pseudonyms. That is, the people of the "Russian World" are so accustomed to relations above and below that they do not tolerate objections even from an unknown nickname .

Discredit:

Discrediting is one of the most popular methods of the FSB. -
The FSB provocateurs call themselves nationalist Chechens or Ukrainians, arouse hostility among Russians and approval of the massacres of Chechens and Ukrainians .
In particular, the persecution of the non-Russian language in Ukraine was largely provoked by the Russian Nazis.
In fact, the FSB-Nazis are indifferent to the Russian language - they are only maniacs - the authorities.

I suggest:

I propose to cultivate a Russian-speaking P2P culture - based on Ukrainian social networks.
Unfortunately, FSB trolls are successfully working not only in Russkiy Mir, but also in foreign-language social networks and forums.
Stupid Europeans, accustomed to security, do not notice the manipulation of them.
However, Ukrainians are much better than Europeans familiar with the cunning and aggressiveness of the "Russian World", and therefore it is in Ukraine that P2P culture has a greater chance of purposeful development.

There is no point in just the victory of the Ukrainian state=hierarchy over the Russian hierarchy.
Moreover, the personalities of the hierarchs do not matter.
Ukraine's victory is important - because it will eliminate the hierarchy, which today poses the greatest threat in the use of AI as a weapon of manipulation.

Distributed counterpropaganda:

The idea is that the organization of counter-propaganda should correspond to its goal - the survival of mankind - by replacing hierarchical social structures with flat ones , by eliminating the concentration of power.
Distributed counter-propaganda is P 2 P -counter-propaganda.

Distributed counter-propaganda may be more effective than centralized propaganda.
The mechanism of the threat of using AI -manipulative weapons against people is to personify the impact on each person, taking into account the characteristics and history of this person.
However, P 2 P -counter-propaganda is more adequate than the individualization of centralized manipulation,
P 2 P -counter-propaganda can be as good as individualized-centralized - through the use of Distributed Artificial Intelligence.
See DAI vs. AI

"Monopolism" of opinions:

The concentration of power implies the concentration of precisely power, orders.
The "monopoly" of objective opinions can probably be quite safe.
An example is the opinion-Newton's Law.
That is, strong opinions may well be developed in separate nodes of the Network, and then distributed - decentralized.

 

2840

 

Social patriotism:

§ 2 reasons for patriotism:

1. Cultural:
Those families who helped the stronger ruler were successful.
This is also the reason for the consolidation of tribes before the formation of states and empires.
This is the reason for wars. – More aggressive rulers survived.
2. Genetic.

§ The instability of patriotism today:

On the 1st side - Mrs. propaganda ensures the cultural sustainability of patriotism. -
Patriotism is "brought up" in public schools and all propaganda - from childhood.
On the 2nd side - Separation of rulers destroys state patriotism in large states.

§ Personal example:

I have repeatedly asked for help from Mr. police. She never helped me.
But the police repeatedly tried to rob me on the street.
All the judges I have encountered have turned out to be criminals violating the laws of their own state.
As a result, for the state in which I live, I feel disgust, not far from hatred.

§ Other factors that reduce patriotism today:

1. Wars between large states are not beneficial to rulers.
2. Cheaper communication makes it difficult to depict citizens of other states as monsters.
3. Culture is globalized - internationalized due to the same reduction in the cost of communications and transport.

§ Social patriotism:

However, the feeling of patriotism does not have to be suppressed.
It can simply be switched - from a territorial organization - to a social one .

§ Analogues: Football fans, Religious communities:

Authoritarian states struggle with subcultures not in vain.

§ Validity of alternatives:

It's just that social organizations alternative to the state should be full-fledged - include all spheres of life, except only - the territory.
Today, the territory for a full-fledged life is not required.
A reasonable person should - choose the object of his patriotism, as his ancestors did.

§ On the transformation of the imperialist war into a civil one :

You don't have to fight at all.
Social patriotism can be positive and constructive.
- You can simply participate in an alternative economy and build it.
From Mrs. Terrorists who cover for bailiffs are quite possible to defend themselves - non-violently - today.

§ Alter Russia:

You can make a social organization as similar as possible to the usual enemy territorial organization - so as not to switch your habits at all.
The only difference between the alternative then will be only - economic independence from the enemy organization.

 

2132

 

Nonviolence, Crime and Micro Communities:

Inversion of freedom: What to do with criminals?:

Not to isolate criminals from their society, but, on the contrary, to isolate themselves from criminals.
Micro-communities themselves will initially be isolated from existing states, since their law will not "join" with the law of even democratic states.
Criminals are not deprived of their freedom, but are expelled.

However, nothing prevents:
1. To carry out "information monitoring" - according to the procedures - by consensus adopted by the participants of the Micro-community.
A factor in the very emergence of independent free " super-democratic " communities is the growing problem of democratic control over the surveillance of citizens in "democratic" states due to the decrease in the cost of IT capabilities.
2. Surrender criminals to the organs of violence of states.
This can be done without using violence - by ourselves, but simply by cooperating in organizing the capture.

This option is in good agreement with the Micro-community location option - On the territory of those democratic states
This option is a kind of symbiosis with the most democratic states.

The multiplicity of diverse independent communities in the Federation will also be a factor in this option.
Violence is one of the main "glues" of existence - large states.
The very diversity and smallness of Communities is a consequence of freedom and non-violence in them.

On the 1st side, it will be difficult for Micro-communities to have an apparatus for prosecuting criminals.
2nd side, the criminals themselves will be able to easily move between free Micro-communities, parasitizing and avoiding responsibility.

Option 2 - Hybrid non-violence :

Non-violence is in the economic spheres, but the preservation of the collective necessary self-defense is in the sphere of personal integrity.
The optimal means of collective self-defense is the Network of non-lethal micro-missiles.
This option is in good agreement with the Micro-Community Location Option - No Man's Land - Offshore

Micro-community location options:

1. On the territory of those democratic states :

- On the territory of those democratic states in which it will be possible to create special legislation for autonomous communities.
Micro-communities that do not use violence for legal relations - can develop - inside and on the territory of democratic states.
Preferably located non-violent Micro-communities - On the fringes of democratic states - for maximum autonomy.
This option is realistic because it does not violate the state's monopoly on violence.

Advantages:

"+" External protection.

Possible options:

• Greenland;
• Alaska;
• Hundreds of uninhabited islands in Europe, North America, Japan, Australia, New Zealand;
• Islands of French, British Polynesia.

2. No man's land, At sea :

This option is in good agreement with the Micro-community option Hybrid non - violence

 

2552