Divine works


eng deu рус


Battle for the King:

Ponomarev and K believe that all methods have been tested and only 1 remains - the physical elimination of the entire terrorist leadership in order to prevent a civil war. Moreover, the liquidation is unexpected, without warning.
Only to warn innocent people not to approach terrorists - National Guardsmen, etc.
Probably Ponomarev and K are right.
However, we must try to use bloodless methods - to the maximum.

For example, Lukashenka:
Perhaps he is the only one in the post-Soviet space for whom the interests of the people of Belarus are more important than personal ambitions.
Probably, Lukashenko is sincerely convinced that there will be only one harm from the "Maidan" to the people - other monopolists will simply seize power, who will rob the people more than ever .

Lukashenka was put in power because he is a man of honor and word.
Lukashenka is an excellent "face" of power - precisely because of his sincerity.
At the same time, Lukashenka's entourage knows that he is predictable and reliable, despite the fact that he is "strong". And that they can be manipulated.
The idea is to seize this initiative.
The idea is that the weakness of the mafia, which created the one-man regime, is in their own concentration of power. This was demonstrated by Gorbach in the USSR .

Lukashenka boldly goes out to the workers and offers himself: "Come, let's talk."
So let's come up and talk - by video link with Lukashenka, openly - at the same time, with all the supporters of the junta. Maybe it will help. At the very least, it will reduce the number of victims .

But first you need to work out:
1. An optimal program for Belarus, which guarantees that the people will only benefit from the transit of power and democracy.
2. The optimal approach to Lukashenka. Considering all his psychological " troubles ".

There is more than one program for Belarus.
However, they are all raw. They have many controversial provisions. Precisely because the structures that created these Programs are very imperfect. Some of them are really focused - on the seizure of power.
The program should be as comprehensive as possible - up to the development of all alternative legislation.
It is also necessary to model the operation of the new social system.

In 1990, I initiated the "Self-Organization of the Deliberative Structure" primarily for the development of a reliable Program.
And now I think that this is the best way. -
First of all, self-organization of an independent flat scientific social network is necessary, the first issue of which will be - its own self-organization - for efficiency and orientation to the interests of people, not sponsors.

If the proposed technology helps in Belarus, then the well-established technology will help somewhere else - to reduce the number of victims and the number of allies of propaganda regimes that threaten the existence of Mankind.

" Konnor "

2285